Literature DB >> 9802181

Restriction as a method for reducing bias in the estimation of direct effects.

M M Joffe1, G A Colditz.   

Abstract

The direct effect of a treatment on some outcome is that part of the treatment's effect not referred through a specified covariate intermediate on the pathway between treatment and outcome. Such direct effects are often of primary interest in a data analysis. Unfortunately, standard methods of analysis (for example, stratification or modelling) do not, in general, produce consistent estimates of direct effects whether or not the covariate is 'controlled'. Robins and co-authors have proposed two methods for estimation of direct effects applicable when reliable information is available on the covariate. We propose a third approach for reducing bias: data restriction. By restricting the analysis to strata of the data in which the effect of treatment on the covariate is small, we can (under certain assumptions) reduce bias in estimating treatment's direct effect. We discuss these points with reference to difference and ratio measures of treatment effect. The approach will sometimes be applicable even with an unmeasured or poorly measured covariate. We illustrate these points with data from an observational study of the effect of hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9802181     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2233::aid-sim922>3.0.co;2-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Antidepressant adequacy and work status among medicaid enrollees with disabilities: a restriction-based, propensity score-adjusted analysis.

Authors:  Eric G Smith; Alexis D Henry; Jianying Zhang; Fred Hooven; Steven M Banks
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2009-10

2.  Commentary: The wizard of odds.

Authors:  Richard F MacLehose; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Causal inference in longitudinal comparative effectiveness studies with repeated measures of a continuous intermediate variable.

Authors:  Chen-Pin Wang; Booil Jo; C Hendricks Brown
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  A further critique of the analytic strategy of adjusting for covariates to identify biologic mediation.

Authors:  Jay S Kaufman; Richard F Maclehose; Sol Kaufman
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2004-10-08

6.  Risk of hospitalization for community acquired pneumonia with renin-angiotensin blockade in elderly patients: a population-based study.

Authors:  Sachin Shah; Eric McArthur; Alexandra Farag; Michael Nartey; Jamie L Fleet; Greg A Knoll; S Joseph Kim; Amit X Garg; Arsh K Jain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.