Literature DB >> 9801935

A sequential randomised controlled trial comparing a dry visco-elastic polymer pad and standard operating table mattress in the prevention of post-operative pressure sores.

J Nixon1, D McElvenny, S Mason, J Brown, S Bond.   

Abstract

Four hundred and forty-six general, vascular and gynaecological surgical patients were recruited to a two centre, double triangular sequential randomised controlled trial to compare the post-operative pressure sore incidence in patients positioned on the standard operating table mattress with those positioned on the dry visco-elastic polymer pad (Action Products Inc.). Two hundred and twenty two patients were randomised to the experimental group and 224 to the standard mattress. The main endpoint failure rate (a pressure sore) was found to be 11% (22/205) for patients allocated to the dry visco-elastic polymer pad and 20% (43/211) for patients allocated to the standard operating table mattress. There was a significant reduction in the odds of developing a pressure sore on the dry visco-elastic polymer pad as compared to the standard, [symbol see text] = 0.46 with 95% confidence interval of (0.26, 0.82), P = 0.010. The adjusted point estimates of the probability of developing a pressure sore on the dry visco-elastic polymer pad and the standard operating table mattress were 0.11 and 0.21 respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9801935     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7489(98)00023-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  19 in total

1.  Preventing pressure sores. Good nursing care should prevent pressure sores.

Authors:  A Hahn; F Hall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

Review 2.  Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Maggie J Westby; Jo C Dumville; Marta O Soares; Nikki Stubbs; Gill Norman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-22

Review 3.  Assessment and management of pressure ulcers in the elderly: current strategies.

Authors:  Efraim Jaul
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Pressure ulcer prevalence and risk factors during prolonged surgical procedures.

Authors:  Mike Primiano; Michael Friend; Connie McClure; Scott Nardi; Lisa Fix; Marianne Schafer; Kathlyn Savochka; Molly McNett
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.676

5.  Formal consensus: the development of a national clinical guideline.

Authors:  J Rycroft-Malone
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

6.  Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-10

7.  Pressure ulcer prevention: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-04-01

8.  Alternative reactive support surfaces (non-foam and non-air-filled) for preventing pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Chunhu Shi; Jo C Dumville; Nicky Cullum; Sarah Rhodes; Elizabeth McInnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 9.  Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Elizabeth McInnes; Asmara Jammali-Blasi; Sally E M Bell-Syer; Jo C Dumville; Victoria Middleton; Nicky Cullum
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-03

10.  Validity of pressure ulcer diagnosis using digital photography.

Authors:  Mona Baumgarten; David J Margolis; Joan L Selekof; Nancy Moye; Patricia S Jones; Michelle Shardell
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.617

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.