Literature DB >> 9801083

Assessment of rearfoot motion: passive positioning, one-legged standing, gait.

L Torburn1, J Perry, J K Gronley.   

Abstract

Earlier studies that address assessment of the subtalar joint (STJ) by measuring rearfoot motion used a goniometer to evaluate intertester reliability. Few investigations have determined how positions of the rearfoot, assessed manually (passive range of motion) or statically in one-legged standing, compare with those occurring during walking. The purpose of this study was to determine the following: (1) the intertester reliability of positioning the STJ in neutral, maximum inversion, and maximum eversion; (2) the reliability of the rearfoot position during relaxed one-legged standing; and (3) how these positions compare to rearfoot motion during walking. An electrogoniometer attached to the lateral aspect of the lower leg and heel was used to record the position of the rearfoot during testing procedures. Ten healthy volunteers participated. Rearfoot position was recorded during relaxed one-legged standing and during free and fast walking. Additionally, rearfoot position was recorded while each of three physical therapists positioned the STJ in neutral, maximum inversion, and maximum eversion. Intertester reliability for positioning the STJ in neutral, maximum inversion, and maximum eversion yielded intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.76, 0.37, and 0.39, respectively. Reliability of relaxed one-legged standing had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92. The rearfoot position in relaxed one-legged standing and the maximum eversion position occurring during gait were not significantly different. These findings suggest that there is good intertester reliability in positioning the STJ in neutral. Additionally, the rearfoot position in relaxed one-legged standing may be used to approximate the maximum eversion position that occurs during gait.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9801083     DOI: 10.1177/107110079801901007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

1.  Deep posterior compartment strength and foot kinematics in subjects with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Christopher Neville; Adolph S Flemister; Jeff R Houck
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 2.  Musculoskeletal conditions of the foot and ankle: assessments and treatment options.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Jody L Riskowski; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view.

Authors:  Mikel L Reilingh; Lijkele Beimers; Gabriëlle J M Tuijthof; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Mario Maas; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Arch height change during sit-to-stand: an alternative for the navicular drop test.

Authors:  Thomas G McPoil; Mark W Cornwall; Lynn Medoff; Bill Vicenzino; Kelly Forsberg; Dana Hilz
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Reproducibility of and sex differences in common orthopaedic ankle and foot tests in runners.

Authors:  Maarten P van der Worp; Anton de Wijer; J Bart Staal; Maria W G Nijhuis- van der Sanden
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.