| Literature DB >> 9800591 |
C J Ryan1.
Abstract
The slippery slope argument has been the mainstay of many of those opposed to the legalisation of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. In this paper I re-examine the slippery slope in the light of two recent studies that examined the prevalence of medical decisions concerning the end of life in the Netherlands and in Australia. I argue that these two studies have robbed the slippery slope of the source of its power--its intuitive obviousness. Finally I propose that, contrary to the warnings of the slippery slope, the available evidence suggests that the legalisation of physician-assisted suicide might actually decrease the prevalence of non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia.Entities:
Keywords: Death and Euthanasia; Remmelink Commission
Mesh:
Year: 1998 PMID: 9800591 PMCID: PMC1377611 DOI: 10.1136/jme.24.5.341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903