Literature DB >> 9799738

Visual recovery after monocular deprivation is driven by absolute, rather than relative, visually evoked activity levels.

D E Mitchell1, G Gingras.   

Abstract

It is now well established that the anatomical and functional development of the central visual pathways of a number of higher mammalian species is activity-dependent [1-3]. This dependence was revealed by the functional effects of an early period of monocular deprivation, where one eye of a young animal was deprived for a time of patterned visual input. Subsequently, most cells in the visual cortex (area 17) could be excited only by visual stimuli delivered to the non deprived eye [4-6] and the animal appeared blind through the deprived eye [7,8]. These effects have been attributed to a competitive activity-dependent mechanism in development, whereby the two eyes compete for control of cortical cells [9,10]. There are, however, suggestions that the substantial recovery that can occur after monocular deprivation may be mediated by a different mechanism. Here, insight into the nature of this mechanism has been provided by monitoring the speed of changes in the vision of the deprived eye of a kitten after 6 days of monocular deprivation. Although both eyes were open during the recovery period, the kitten was able to see with its deprived eye only 2 hours after visual input was restored to this eye. The visual acuity of this eye improved rapidly in the first 24 hours and continued in an orderly way for 6 weeks. In contrast to the effects during monocular deprivation, which depend upon a competitive activity-dependent process, we propose that the events that follow deprivation rely on a mechanism driven by the absolute level of visually evoked activity through the formerly deprived eye.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9799738     DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00489-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  9 in total

1.  Initial recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens is faster when both eyes are open.

Authors:  D E Mitchell; G Gingras; P C Kind
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ocular dominance plasticity is stably maintained in the absence of alpha calcium calmodulin kinase II (alphaCaMKII) autophosphorylation.

Authors:  Sharif A Taha; Michael P Stryker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Recovery from chronic monocular deprivation following reactivation of thalamocortical plasticity by dark exposure.

Authors:  Karen L Montey; Elizabeth M Quinlan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  The relationship between anisometropia and amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Arthur Bradley; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and implications for practice.

Authors:  C E Stewart; M J Moseley; A R Fielder; D A Stephens
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Assessing binocular interaction in amblyopia and its clinical feasibility.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Zhong-Lin Lu; Alexandra Miller; Melanie Kazlas; David G Hunter; Peter J Bex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Chronic Monocular Deprivation Reveals MMP9-Dependent and -Independent Aspects of Murine Visual System Plasticity.

Authors:  Sachiko Murase; Sarah E Robertson; Crystal L Lantz; Ji Liu; Daniel E Winkowski; Elizabeth M Quinlan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of recovery following early visual deprivation.

Authors:  Donald E Mitchell; Frank Sengpiel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Infant cortex responds to other humans from shortly after birth.

Authors:  Teresa Farroni; Antonio M Chiarelli; Sarah Lloyd-Fox; Stefano Massaccesi; Arcangelo Merla; Valentina Di Gangi; Tania Mattarello; Dino Faraguna; Mark H Johnson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.