Literature DB >> 9799270

Allelic genealogies in sporophytic self-incompatibility systems in plants.

M H Schierup1, X Vekemans, F B Christiansen.   

Abstract

Expectations for the time scale and structure of allelic genealogies in finite populations are formed under three models of sporophytic self-incompatibility. The models differ in the dominance interactions among the alleles that determine the self-incompatibility phenotype: In the SSIcod model, alleles act codominantly in both pollen and style, in the SSIdom model, alleles form a dominance hierarchy, and in SSIdomcod, alleles are codominant in the style and show a dominance hierarchy in the pollen. Coalescence times of alleles rarely differ more than threefold from those under gametophytic self-incompatibility, and transspecific polymorphism is therefore expected to be equally common. The previously reported directional turnover process of alleles in the SSIdomcod model results in coalescence times lower and substitution rates higher than those in the other models. The SSIdom model assumes strong asymmetries in allelic action, and the most recessive extant allele is likely to be the most recent common ancestor. Despite these asymmetries, the expected shape of the allele genealogies does not deviate markedly from the shape of a neutral gene genealogy. The application of the results to sequence surveys of alleles, including interspecific comparisons, is discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9799270      PMCID: PMC1460403     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  19 in total

1.  Polymorphism at the self-incompatibility locus in Solanaceae predates speciation.

Authors:  T R Ioerger; A G Clark; T H Kao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Striking sequence similarity in inter- and intra-specific comparisons of class I SLG alleles from Brassica oleracea and Brassica campestris: implications for the evolution and recognition mechanism.

Authors:  M Kusaba; T Nishio; Y Satta; K Hinata; D Ockendon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Excess nonsynonymous substitution of shared polymorphic sites among self-incompatibility alleles of Solanaceae.

Authors:  A G Clark; T H Kao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  How flowering plants discriminate between self and non-self pollen to prevent inbreeding.

Authors:  T H Kao; A G McCubbin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  S-allele sequence diversity in natural populations of Solanum carolinense (Horsenettle).

Authors:  A D Richman; T H Kao; S W Schaeffer; M K Uyenoyama
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Allelic diversity and gene genealogy at the self-incompatibility locus in the Solanaceae.

Authors:  A D Richman; M K Uyenoyama; J R Kohn
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genealogical structure among alleles regulating self-incompatibility in natural populations of flowering plants.

Authors:  M K Uyenoyama
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Allelic genealogy under overdominant and frequency-dependent selection and polymorphism of major histocompatibility complex loci.

Authors:  N Takahata; M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A simple genealogical structure of strongly balanced allelic lines and trans-species evolution of polymorphism.

Authors:  N Takahata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The origin of MHC class II gene polymorphism within the genus Mus.

Authors:  T J McConnell; W S Talbot; R A McIndoe; E K Wakeland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  17 in total

1.  The signature of balancing selection: fungal mating compatibility gene evolution.

Authors:  G May; F Shaw; H Badrane; X Vekemans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Recombination, balancing selection and phylogenies in MHC and self-incompatibility genes.

Authors:  M H Schierup; A M Mikkelsen; J Hein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The dominance of alleles controlling self-incompatibility in Brassica pollen is regulated at the RNA level.

Authors:  Hiroshi Shiba; Megumi Iwano; Tetsuyuki Entani; Kyoko Ishimoto; Hiroko Shimosato; Fang-Sik Che; Yoko Satta; Akiko Ito; Yoshinobu Takada; Masao Watanabe; Akira Isogai; Seiji Takayama
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Evolutionary dynamics of self-incompatibility alleles in Brassica.

Authors:  M K Uyenoyama
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Consequences of recombination on traditional phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  M H Schierup; J Hein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genealogy-dependent variation in viability among self-incompatibility genotypes.

Authors:  Marcy K Uyenoyama
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of rates of recombination within mating-type regions.

Authors:  Naoki Takebayashi; Ed Newbigin; Marcy K Uyenoyama
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Selection at work in self-incompatible Arabidopsis lyrata: mating patterns in a natural population.

Authors:  Mikkel H Schierup; Jesper S Bechsgaard; Lene H Nielsen; Freddy B Christiansen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Recombination at Prunus S-locus region SLFL1 gene.

Authors:  Jorge Vieira; Eliana Teles; Raquel A M Santos; Cristina P Vieira
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Linkage disequilibrium between incompatibility locus region genes in the plant Arabidopsis lyrata.

Authors:  Jenny Hagenblad; Jesper Bechsgaard; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.