Literature DB >> 9799210

Cardiovascular outcome in white-coat versus sustained mild hypertension: a 10-year follow-up study.

R S Khattar1, R Senior, A Lahiri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the risk conferred by white-coat versus sustained mild hypertension for the development of cardiovascular disease. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients (n=479) who underwent 24-hour intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on the basis of a persistently elevated clinic systolic blood pressure of 140 to 180 mm Hg were followed up for the development of subsequent cardiovascular events during a 9.1+/-4. 2-year period. White-coat hypertension, defined as a clinic systolic blood pressure of 140 to 180 mm Hg associated with a 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure <140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, was present in 126 patients, and the remainder had sustained mild hypertension. A subgroup of patients without complications underwent follow-up echocardiography and carotid ultrasound. White-coat hypertensives were younger (44+/-12 versus 52+/-10 years, respectively; P<0.001) and had a significantly lower incidence of cardiovascular events (1.32 versus 2.56 events per 100 patient-years, respectively; P<0.001) than sustained hypertensives. Multivariate analysis revealed age (P=0.002), sex (P=0.007), race (P=0.001), smoking (P=0.005), and the presence of white-coat hypertension (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.90; P=0.04) to be independent predictors of subsequent cardiovascular events. Subgroup analysis in patients without complications revealed a lower incidence of left ventricular hypertrophy and lesser degrees of carotid hypertrophy in the white-coat group.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate a relatively benign outcome in white-coat hypertension compared with sustained mild hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9799210     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.98.18.1892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  33 in total

1.  Does "white coat hypertension" increase the risk for any adverse outcome from hypertension?

Authors:  J A Simon
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  Using out of office blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  P Verdecchia
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Myocardial Performance Index in Childhood Onset Essential Hypertension and White Coat Hypertension.

Authors:  Monesha Gupta-Malhotra; Rabih K Hamzeh; Tim Poffenbarger; Karen McNiece-Redwine; Syed Shahrukh Hashmi
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Coronary flow reserve is preserved in white-coat hypertension.

Authors:  D Erdogan; H Gullu; M Caliskan; I Yildirim; D Tok; H Muderrisoglu
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  The circadian nuances of hypertension: a reappraisal of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  E O'Brien
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Pediatrics: Masked hypertension: a risk factor in children with CKD.

Authors:  Robert H Mak; George Bakris
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  White coat hypertension: addressing the 10 most important questions.

Authors:  Louis Kuritzky
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Mild hypertension: to treat or not to treat?

Authors:  Bernard Waeber; Helmy M Siragy
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.369

9.  Clinical implications of ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Soon-Gil Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Prevalence, predictive factor, and clinical significance of white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension in Korean hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Eui-Seock Hwang; Kee-Joon Choi; Duk-Hyun Kang; Gi-Byoung Nam; Jae-Sik Jang; Young-Hoon Jeong; Chang-Hoon Lee; Ji-Young Lee; Hyun-Koo Park; Chong-Hun Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.