Literature DB >> 9799051

The rationale for combination versus single-entity therapy in hypertension.

M R Weir1.   

Abstract

The rationale behind combination therapy relates to the fact that when two different classes of agents are combined, they may provide complementary, additive, or synergistic antihypertensive effects through different mechanisms. Lower doses of two drugs, which provide blood pressure reduction similar to higher doses of one drug, may enhance tolerability and improve compliance. Investigative efforts have been undertaken to explore fixed-dose combinations of drugs that do not include diuretics. The first nondiuretic fixed-dose combinations are an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-calcium antagonist combination or a beta-blocker-calcium antagonist combination. The rationale for an ACE inhibitor-calcium antagonist combination is based on the fact that both drugs reduce vasoconstriction through different mechanisms. The ACE inhibitor largely attenuates vasoconstriction through augmentation of vasodilatory kinins and reduction of the vasoconstrictive effect of angiotensin II, whereas the calcium antagonists, through attenuating the transmembrane flux of calcium, inhibit calcium-mediated electromechanical coupling in contractile tissue in response to numerous stimuli. Moreover, both classes of drugs facilitate salt and water excretion by the kidney through different mechanisms. The ACE inhibitor restores the renal-adrenal response to salt loading, whereas the calcium antagonist possesses intrinsic natriuretic properties through poorly described mechanisms of inhibiting renal tubular salt and water reabsorption. The combination of a beta-blocker and dihydropyridine calcium antagonist is logical due to the different antihypertensive mechanisms of these drugs without risk of cardiac conduction abnormalities. There is evidence in clinical trials that ACE inhibitors may offset one of the major side effects associated with calcium antagonist therapy: pedal edema. Although the studies are small and the observations subjective, there is consistent evidence that the combination may provide an opportunity to reduce the likelihood of this common clinical problem. There is also evidence of reduced calcium antagonist-associated constipation and headache with this type of drug combination, likely because lower doses of this agent are used in combination with ACE inhibitors. However, there is no published evidence that calcium antagonists reduce the cough associated with the ACE inhibitor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9799051     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(98)00189-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  7 in total

Review 1.  Compliance, quality of life, and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  W B Stason
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Rationale for fixed-dose combinations in the treatment of hypertension: the cycle repeats.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The case for combining angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers.

Authors:  A A Taylor; S Sunthornyothin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Efficacy and tolerability of a switch to fixed-dose combination therapy with amlodipine besylate/benazepril hydrochloride after monotherapy with amlodipine besylate: Data from the African-American subpopulation of a practice-based, open-label study (the LOGIC study).

Authors:  Marjorie Gatlin; Wentworth G Jarrett; Oliseyenum M Nwose
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2004-03

5.  How to avoid discontinuation of antihypertensive treatment: The experience in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Katia Coelho Ortega; Josiane Lima de Gusmão; Angela Maria Geraldo Pierin; José Luiz Nishiura; Edna Caetano Ignez; Carlos Alexandre Segre; Carlucci Gualberto Ventura; Gisele Peixoto Mano; Viviane Fontes; Francisco Mogadouro da Cunha; Décio Mion
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Comparison of candesartan and felodipine alone and combined in the treatment of hypertension: a single-center, double-blind, randomized, crossover trial.

Authors:  Sanem Nalbantgil; Mehdi Zoghi; Filiz Ozerkan; Bahar Boydak; Istemi Nalbantgil; Remzi Onder; Mustafa Akin
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2003-07

Review 7.  A review of telmisartan in the treatment of hypertension: blood pressure control in the early morning hours.

Authors:  Philippe Gosse
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2006
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.