Literature DB >> 9798005

Determining the similarity of deformable shapes.

R Basri1, L Costa, D Geiger, D Jacobs.   

Abstract

Determining the similarity of two shapes is a significant task in both machine and human vision systems that must recognize or classify objects. The exact properties of human shape similarity judgements are not well understood yet, and this task is particularly difficult in domains where the shapes are not related by rigid transformation. In this paper we identify a number of possibly desirable properties of a shape similarity method, and determine the extent to which these properties can be captured by approaches that compare local properties of the contours of the shapes, through elastic matching. Special attention is devoted to objects that possess articulations, i.e. articulated parts. Elastic matching evaluates the similarity of two shapes as the sum of local deformations needed to change one shape into another. We show that similarities of part structure can be captured by such an approach, without the explicit computation of part structure. This may be of importance, since although parts appear to play a significant role in visual recognition, it is difficult to stably determine part structure. We also show novel results about how one can evaluate smooth and polyhedral shapes with the same method. Finally, we describe shape similarity effects that cannot be handled by current approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9798005     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00043-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Geometric observers for dynamically evolving curves.

Authors:  Marc Niethammer; Patricio A Vela; Allen Tannenbaum
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  Shape Matching and Registration by Data-driven EM.

Authors:  Zhuowen Tu; Songfeng Zheng; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Comput Vis Image Underst       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Avoiding symmetry-breaking spatial non-uniformity in deformable image registration via a quasi-volume-preserving constraint.

Authors:  Iman Aganj; Martin Reuter; Mert R Sabuncu; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Dynamic programming and graph algorithms in computer vision.

Authors:  Pedro F Felzenszwalb; Ramin Zabih
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  A statistical model for mapping morphological shape.

Authors:  Guifang Fu; Arthur Berg; Kiranmoy Das; Jiahan Li; Runze Li; Rongling Wu
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.432

6.  GNSS Trajectory Anomaly Detection Using Similarity Comparison Methods for Pedestrian Navigation.

Authors:  Pekka Peltola; Jialin Xiao; Terry Moore; Antonio R Jiménez; Fernando Seco
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Perspective: Assessing the Flexible Acquisition, Integration, and Deployment of Human Spatial Representations and Information.

Authors:  Michael J Starrett; Arne D Ekstrom
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Modeling of Deformable Objects for Robotic Manipulation: A Tutorial and Review.

Authors:  Veronica E Arriola-Rios; Puren Guler; Fanny Ficuciello; Danica Kragic; Bruno Siciliano; Jeremy L Wyatt
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-09-17

9.  From Sensory Signals to Modality-Independent Conceptual Representations: A Probabilistic Language of Thought Approach.

Authors:  Goker Erdogan; Ilker Yildirim; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Turning visual search time on its head.

Authors:  S P Arun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 1.886

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.