Literature DB >> 9797970

Motion blur and motion sharpening: temporal smear and local contrast non-linearity.

S T Hammett1, M A Georgeson, A Gorea.   

Abstract

Blurred images may appear sharper when drifting than when stationary. But, paradoxically, moving sharp edges may appear more blurred. To resolve this paradox, the perceived sharpness of drifting, blurred, square wave gratings was compared with that of their static analogues over a range of speeds, blurs and spatial frequencies. Both motion blur and motion sharpening occurred, depending upon the physical blur of the patterns. For large extents of blur (> 10 min arc) moving patterns always appeared sharper than their static analogues, but for small blurs (< 10 min arc) moving edges appeared more blurred than stationary ones. We present a quantitative model for the distortion of waveforms in motion based on two factors: (i) visual temporal integration that smears moving images, and (ii) a local contrast non-linearity that increasingly sharpens the effective profile of edges as speed and contrast increase. We suggest that a plausible account of the speed-dependent non-linearity is the differential recruitment of M and P cells at different speeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9797970     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00430-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

1.  Seeing blur: 'motion sharpening' without motion.

Authors:  Mark A Georgeson; Stephen T Hammett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Motion-based super-resolution in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Jonathan A Patrick; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The main sequence of saccades optimizes speed-accuracy trade-off.

Authors:  Christopher M Harris; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Factors Influencing Pseudo-Accommodation-The Difference between Subjectively Reported Range of Clear Focus and Objectively Measured Accommodation Range.

Authors:  Sandeep K Dhallu; Amy L Sheppard; Tom Drew; Toshifumi Mihashi; Juan F Zapata-Díaz; Hema Radhakrishnan; D Robert Iskander; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.