Literature DB >> 9797902

Vertebral fracture assessment using the lateral scoutview of computed tomography in comparison with radiographs.

M Takada1, C Y Wu, T F Lang, H K Genant.   

Abstract

Semiquantitative vertebral fracture assessment was compared between lateral computed tomography (CT) scoutviews and conventional thoracolumbar spinal radiographs. Vertebral levels T4-L4 were assessed by both techniques in a group of 56 women (mean age 60 +/- 13 years). In order to compare inter- and intra-observer variabilities for the two techniques, the images were analyzed twice by two independent observers, and percentage agreement and kappa statistics were measured both between readings and between observers. Percentage agreement and kappa statistics were also used to quantify differences between techniques. In the CT scoutviews, noise and artifacts from overlying tissues in the thoracic spinal levels rendered 3.4% of the vertebrae unreadable for the first observer and 8.3% for the second observer. For the CT scoutviews the agreement between readings was 98.1%, 97.3% and 100% (kappa = 0.87, 0.83 and 1.0) on T4-L12, T4-12 and L1-4, respectively for the first observer, and 97.8%, 97.1% and 99.5% (kappa = 0.79, 0.73 and 0.92) for the second observer. For the lateral radiographs, the agreement between readings was 97.7%, 96.9% and 100% (kappa = 0.87, 0.85 and 1.0) on T4-L12, T4-12 and L1-4, respectively for the first observer, and 98.4%, 97.7% and 99.5% (kappa = 0.86, 0.82 and 0.95) for the second observer. The agreement between observers was 96.1%, 94.4% and 100% (kappa = 0.68, 0.58 and 1.0) on T4-L12, T4-12 and L1-4, respectively for the CT scoutviews and 96.8%, 95.9% and 99.0% (kappa = 0.79, 0.76 and 0.91) for the lateral radiographs. The inter-technique was 95.8%, 94.2% and 99.5% (kappa = 0.73, 0.68 and 0.95) on T4-L12, T4-12 and L1-4, respectively for the first observer and 95.6%, 94.2% and 99.0% (kappa = 0.64, 0.55 and 0.90) for the second observer, with the scoutview technique detecting, on average, 23% fewer fractures than the lateral radiographs. Although the vertebral fracture detection in lumbar spine is quite comparable to that of conventional radiographs, given its reduced sensitivity for vertebral fracture detection in thoracic spine, the lateral CT scoutview technique should not be substituted for conventional radiographs where diagnosis of all vertebral fractures is of primary importance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9797902     DOI: 10.1007/s001980050054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  13 in total

1.  QCT measures of bone strength at the thoracic and lumbar spine: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Blaine A Christiansen; Serkalem Demissie; Kerry E Broe; Qiong Louie-Gao; L Adrienne Cupples; Benjamin J Roberts; Rajaram Manoharam; John D'Agostino; Thomas Lang; Douglas P Kiel; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Intra-and inter-reader reliability of semi-automated quantitative morphometry measurements and vertebral fracture assessment using lateral scout views from computed tomography.

Authors:  Y M Kim; S Demissie; R Eisenberg; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT.

Authors:  J S Bauer; D Müller; A Ambekar; M Dobritz; M Matsuura; F Eckstein; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  [Fracture diagnosis in osteoporosis].

Authors:  J S Bauer; D Müller; E J Rummeny; T M Link
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures using CT lateral scout views: a comparison of semi-automated quantitative vertebral morphometry and radiologist semi-quantitative grading.

Authors:  Y M Kim; S Demissie; H K Genant; X Cheng; W Yu; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Observer agreement in pediatric semiquantitative vertebral fracture diagnosis.

Authors:  Kerry Siminoski; Brian Lentle; Mary Ann Matzinger; Nazih Shenouda; Leanne M Ward
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-12-10

7.  Pentosidine and increased fracture risk in older adults with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Ann V Schwartz; Patrick Garnero; Teresa A Hillier; Deborah E Sellmeyer; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Kenneth R Feingold; Helaine E Resnick; Frances A Tylavsky; Dennis M Black; Steven R Cummings; Tamara B Harris; Douglas C Bauer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  Recognizing and reporting osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Mikayel Grigoryan; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; Pierre D Delmas; Harry K Genant
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Reliability and accuracy of scout CT in the detection of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  A Bazzocchi; F Fuzzi; G Garzillo; D Diano; E Rimondi; B Merlino; A Moio; U Albisinni; G Battista; G Guglielmi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Reliability of vertebral fracture assessment using multidetector CT lateral scout views: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  E J Samelson; B A Christiansen; S Demissie; K E Broe; Y Zhou; C A Meng; W Yu; X Cheng; C J O'Donnell; U Hoffmann; H K Genant; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.