Literature DB >> 9796230

Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension.

S R Speer1, C Clifton.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated how reading time was affected by the plausibility of the prepositional phrase in subject-verb-noun-phrase-prepositional-phrase sentences, and the status of the prepositional phrase as argument versus adjunct of the verb. Highly plausible prepositional phrases were read faster than less plausible ones, and argument prepositional phrases were read faster than adjuncts. These effects appeared both in a self-paced reading experiment and in an experiment that measured eye movements during normal reading. The effects of plausibility were substantially larger and longer lasting than the effects of argument status, but both appeared very early in the reading of the prepositional phrase. The implications of these effects for models of parsing and sentence interpretation are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9796230     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  8 in total

1.  Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-07-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints.

Authors:  M Spivey-Knowlton; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1995-06

3.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; M K Tanenhaus; C Kello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs.

Authors:  E Gilboy; J M Sopena; C Clifton; L Frazier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1995-02

5.  Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English.

Authors:  M Carreiras; C Clifton
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

6.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected].

Authors:  M C MacDonald; N J Pearlmutter; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson; L K Tyler
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1980-03

8.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 8.934

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Another word on parsing relative clauses: eyetracking evidence from Spanish and English.

Authors:  M Carreiras; C Clifton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

2.  Comprehending noun phrase arguments and adjuncts.

Authors:  Shelia M Kenniso
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-01

3.  Differences in the timing of implausibility detection for recipient and instrument prepositional phrases.

Authors:  Allison Blodgett; Julie E Boland
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2004-01

4.  Argument status and PP-attachment.

Authors:  Julie E Boland; Allison Blodgett
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-09

5.  The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing.

Authors:  A R Schmauder; M C Egan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

6.  Looking for a Location: Dissociated Effects of Event-Related Plausibility and Verb-Argument Information on Predictive Processing in Aphasia.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hayes; Michael Walsh Dickey; Tessa Warren
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Using instruments to understand argument structure: Evidence for gradient representation.

Authors:  Lilia Rissman; Kyle Rawlins; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-06

8.  It's hard to offend the college: effects of sentence structure on figurative-language processing.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Eye movements when reading implausible sentences: investigating potential structural influences on semantic integration.

Authors:  Nikole D Patson; Tessa Warren
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  What plausibly affects plausibility? Concept coherence and distributional word coherence as factors influencing plausibility judgments.

Authors:  Louise Connell; Mark T Keane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.