Literature DB >> 9795882

Assumption testing in population pharmacokinetic models: illustrated with an analysis of moxonidine data from congestive heart failure patients.

M O Karlsson1, E N Jonsson, C G Wiltse, J R Wade.   

Abstract

Deriving a population pharmacokinetic model from real data is always associated with numerous assumptions. Violations of these assumptions, especially if undetected, may lead to inappropriate conclusions being made from the analysis. Routinely, only a few of the assumptions are explicitly stated and justified in the reporting of a population model. Here, we attempt to be exhaustive in the presentation of the assumptions made in the course of an analysis of moxonidine pharmacokinetics. The different ways that assumptions were justified, through experience, graphical examination, or additional modeling, are outlined. Models for relaxing assumptions regarding the covariate and statistical submodels, not previously reported in the area of population pharmacokinetic modeling, are also described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9795882     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020561807903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  26 in total

1.  Building population pharmacokinetic--pharmacodynamic models. I. Models for covariate effects.

Authors:  J W Mandema; D Verotta; L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-10

2.  An evaluation of population pharmacokinetics in therapeutic trials. Part III. Prospective data collection versus retrospective data assembly.

Authors:  E J Antal; T H Grasela; R B Smith
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  A nonparametric subject-specific population method for deconvolution: II. External validation.

Authors:  K E Fattinger; D Verotta
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1995-12

4.  Practical experience and issues in designing and performing population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies.

Authors:  L Aarons; L P Balant; F Mentre; P L Morselli; M Rowland; J L Steimer; S Vozeh
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Discrimination between rival dosing histories.

Authors:  E N Jonsson; J R Wade; G Almqvist; M O Karlsson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Pharmacokinetics of moxonidine after single and repeated daily doses in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  D Trenk; F Wagner; E Jähnchen; V Plänitz
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.126

7.  Experimental design and efficient parameter estimation in preclinical pharmacokinetic studies.

Authors:  E I Ette; C A Howie; A W Kelman; B Whiting
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  Some general estimation methods for nonlinear mixed-effects models.

Authors:  M Davidian; D M Giltinan
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  Population pharmacokinetics of riluzole in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  R Bruno; N Vivier; G Montay; A Le Liboux; L K Powe; J C Delumeau; G R Rhodes
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  A population model for the leukopenic effect of etoposide.

Authors:  M O Karlsson; R E Port; M J Ratain; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  72 in total

1.  Likelihood-based diagnostics for influential individuals in non-linear mixed effects model selection.

Authors:  S Sadray; E N Jonsson; M O Karlsson
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Assessment of the relative in vivo potency of the hydroxylated metabolite of darifenacin in its ability to decrease salivary flow using pooled population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data.

Authors:  Thomas Kerbusch; Peter A Milligan; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Models for time-varying covariates in population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis.

Authors:  Ulrika Wählby; Alison H Thomson; Peter A Milligan; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Estimating bias in population parameters for some models for repeated measures ordinal data using NONMEM and NLMIXED.

Authors:  Siv Jönsson; Maria C Kjellsson; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  Bayesian estimation of cyclosporin exposure for routine therapeutic drug monitoring in kidney transplant patients.

Authors:  Hélène Bourgoin; Gilles Paintaud; Matthias Büchler; Yvon Lebranchu; Elisabeth Autret-Leca; France Mentré; Chantal Le Guellec
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  The back-step method--method for obtaining unbiased population parameter estimates for ordered categorical data.

Authors:  Maria C Kjellsson; Siv Jönsson; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 7.  Conditioning on certain random events associated with statistical variability in PK/PD.

Authors:  Stuart L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Population pharmacokinetic analysis of voriconazole plasma concentration data from pediatric studies.

Authors:  Mats O Karlsson; Irja Lutsar; Peter A Milligan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Busulfan in infant to adult hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a population pharmacokinetic model for initial and Bayesian dose personalization.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; Meagan J Bemer; Jeffrey S Barrett; K Scott Baker; Alan S Gamis; Nicholas H G Holford
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Simultaneous pharmacogenetics-based population pharmacokinetic analysis of darunavir and ritonavir in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  José Moltó; George Xinarianos; Cristina Miranda; Sudeep Pushpakom; Samandhy Cedeño; Bonaventura Clotet; Andrew Owen; Marta Valle
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.