Literature DB >> 9795734

Enamel surface morphology after bracket debonding.

R Osorio1, M Toledano, F García-Godoy.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of brackets and the enamel morphology after using six methods for removal of adhesive after bracket debonding. A total of thirty-five recently extracted noncarious human premolars were used. The twin bracket Mini-Taurus was used with the Mono-Lok2 TM bonding system. Shear bond strength (MPa) was calculated. Immediately after the brackets were removed, the teeth were rinsed and dried, using an air-water syringe. The adhesive remnant index was calculated and the debonded teeth with residual adhesive material attached to the enamel surface were equally sorted in seven groups of five, as follows: Group 1. The residual adhesive was removed with a 12-blade tungsten carbide finishing bur in a high-speed handpiece, using water as the coolant. Group 2. The residual adhesive was removed with a 12-blade tungsten carbide finishing bur in a low-speed handpiece, using water as the coolant. Group 3. The residual adhesive was removed with an Arkansas stone: Dura-white stones for finishing composite in a high-speed handpiece using water as the coolant. Group 4. The residual adhesive was removed with an Arkansas stone: Dura-white stones for finishing composite in a low-speed handpiece, using water as the coolant. Group 5. The residual adhesive was removed with Sof-Lex aluminum oxide discs according to manufacturer's instructions in a low-speed handpiece, using water as the coolant. Group 6. The residual adhesive was removed with Enhance Composite Finishing Discs in a low-speed handpiece, using water as the coolant. In this group, the paste was not applied after the polishing discs. Group 7. The residual adhesive was removed with Enhance Composite Finishing Discs and Polishing Cups in a low-speed handpiece, using water as the coolant. Prisma-gloss polishing paste and ultrafine polishing paste were applied according to manufacturer's instructions. After removal of the adhesive, all teeth were evaluated with the scanning electron microscope. The results revealed a mean shear bond strength of 12.75 MPa. The higher the bond strength, the higher the percentage of ARI. The smoothest enamel surface was obtained when the Enhance system with the gloss polishing paste was used; the second smoothest enamel surface was obtained when using Sof-Lex discs. If the paste was not used with the Enhance system, the obtained surface was rougher than when using Sof-Lex discs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9795734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child        ISSN: 1945-1954


  8 in total

1.  Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of human dental enamel after bracket debonding: a noncontact three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis.

Authors:  Fabiano G Ferreira; Darcy F Nouer; Nelson P Silva; Ivana U Garbui; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Paulo R A Nouer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Roughness of enamel surfaces after different bonding and debonding procedures : An in vitro study.

Authors:  Lorenz M Brauchli; Eva-Maria Baumgartner; Judith Ball; Andrea Wichelhaus
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  Effect of orthodontic debonding and adhesive removal on the enamel - current knowledge and future perspectives - a systematic review.

Authors:  Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Tomasz Szatkiewicz; Robert Tomkowski; Katarzyna Tandecka; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-10-20

4.  Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of the desensitizing and remineralizing agent in the reduction of dentin hypersensitivity after orthodontic debonding - a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sasipriya Vatturu; Vivek Reddy Ganugapanta; Naga Ravi Teja; Gowri Sankar Singaraju; Prasad Mandava; Js Yamini Priyanka
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-04-29

5.  Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique (FIT) Improves Tooth Surface Clean-Up after Debonding of Buccal and Lingual Orthodontic Appliances.

Authors:  Olivia Engeler; Oliver Stadler; Simone Horn; Christian Dettwiler; Thomas Connert; Carlalberta Verna; Georgios Kanavakis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  A comparison of traditional orthodontic polishing systems with composite polishing systems following orthodontic debonding.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Melvin; Qingzhao Yu; Xiaoming Xu; Camille G Laird; Paul C Armbruster; Richard W Ballard
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2021-09-14

7.  Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of adhesive remnants and enamel loss resulting from debonding orthodontic molar tubes.

Authors:  Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Katarzyna Tandecka; Tomasz Szatkiewicz; Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Three-dimensional analysis of enamel surface alteration resulting from orthodontic clean-up -comparison of three different tools.

Authors:  Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Katarzyna Tandecka; Tomasz Szatkiewicz; Piotr Stępień; Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.