Literature DB >> 9795448

Evaluation of two D-Dimer assays in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

W Wijns1, N Daoud, I Droeshout, O Pradier, J C Wautrecht, J Golzarian, P Capel.   

Abstract

A qualitative (Instantia) and a quantitative (VIDAS D-Dimer) D-Dimer test have been evaluated and compared with an ELISA method (Asserachrom D-D) in a population of 74 patients suspected of presenting a deep vein thrombosis. Among the thirty-two patients presenting a deep vein thrombosis on phlebography, there were 16 (50%) proximal vein thrombosis and 16 (50%) distal vein thrombosis. Sensitivity and negative predictive value for proximal thrombosis were 100% in all three tests. For distal vein thrombosis, sensitivity and negative predictive value were respectively 81% and 81% for Asserachrom D-DI 75% and 76% for VIDAS D-Dimer and 63% and 82% for Instantia. In conclusion, this study shows that these D-Di assays are a useful tool to exclude proximal vein thrombosis, at least for patients who are not under anticoagulant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9795448     DOI: 10.1080/17843286.1998.11754174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Clin Belg        ISSN: 1784-3286            Impact factor:   1.264


  2 in total

Review 1.  Combined use of rapid D-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review.

Authors:  Tonya L Fancher; Richard H White; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-09-21

2.  Plasma D-dimer is not useful in the prediction of deep vein thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty in patients using rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  Cheng-Ta Wu; Bradley Chen; Jun-Wen Wang; Shih-Hsiang Yen; Chung-Cheng Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.