Literature DB >> 9794945

Effects of sleep position on infant motor development.

B E Davis1, R Y Moon, H C Sachs, M C Ottolini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a result of the American Academy of Pediatrics' recommendation that healthy infants be placed on their side or back for sleep, the percentage of infants sleeping prone has decreased dramatically. With the increase in supine sleeping, pediatricians have questioned if there are differences in the rate of acquisition of early motor milestones between prone and supine sleeping infants.
METHODS: To examine this question, we performed a prospective, practice-based study of healthy term infants. Infants were recruited before the age of 2 months. Parents were asked to record infant sleep position and awake time spent prone until 6 months of age. A developmental log was used to track milestones from birth until the infant was walking. Age of acquisition of eight motor milestones was determined, and the mean ages of milestone attainment of prone and supine sleepers were compared.
RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-one infants completed the study. Prone sleepers acquired motor milestones at an earlier age than supine sleepers. There was a significant difference in the age of attainment of rolling prone to supine, tripod sitting, creeping, crawling, and pulling to stand. There was no significant difference in age when infants walked.
CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of early motor development is affected by sleep position. Prone sleepers attain several motor milestones earlier than supine sleepers. However, all infants achieved all milestones within the accepted normal age range. Pediatricians can use this information to reassure parents. This difference in milestone attainment is not a reason to abandon the American Academy of Pediatrics' sleep position recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9794945     DOI: 10.1542/peds.102.5.1135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  39 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic strategies for the evaluation of asymmetry in infancy-a review.

Authors:  Leo A van Vlimmeren; Paul J M Helders; Léon N A van Adrichem; Raoul H H Engelbert
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  Intentional action processing across the transition to crawling: Does the experience of self-locomotion impact infants' understanding of intentional actions?

Authors:  Amanda C Brandone; Wyntre Stout; Kelsey Moty
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2020-07-24

3.  Characterization and intervention for upper extremity exploration & reaching behaviors in infancy.

Authors:  M A Lobo; J C Galloway; J C Heathcock
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 4.  Neurodevelopmental implications of "deformational" plagiocephaly.

Authors:  Brent Collett; David Breiger; Darcy King; Michael Cunningham; Matthew Speltz
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.225

5.  Supine and prone infant positioning: a winning combination.

Authors:  Martha Wilson Jones
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2004

6.  Infant Positioning, Baby Gear Use, and Cranial Asymmetry.

Authors:  Anne H Zachry; Vikki G Nolan; Sarah B Hand; Susan A Klemm
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-12

Review 7.  Development (of Walking): 15 Suggestions.

Authors:  Karen E Adolph; Justine E Hoch; Whitney G Cole
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Cinderella indeed - a commentary on Iverson's 'Developing language in a developing body: the relationship between motor development and language development'.

Authors:  Karen E Adolph; Catherine S Tamis-Lemonda; Lana B Karasik
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2010-01-20

9.  Effects of access to a stimulating object on infant behavior during tummy time.

Authors:  Heather J Kadey; Henry S Roane
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

10.  Movement Assessment of Children (MAC): validity, reliability, stability and sensitivity to change in typically developing children.

Authors:  L S Chandler; L Terhorst; J C Rogers; M B Holm
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 2.508

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.