Literature DB >> 9794669

Domestic violence screening practices of obstetrician-gynecologists.

D L Horan1, J Chapin, L Klein, L A Schmidt, J Schulkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the current knowledge base and screening practices of obstetrician-gynecologists in the area of domestic violence.
METHODS: We mailed a survey to 189 ACOG Fellows who are members of the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network. Questionnaires were also mailed to a random sample of 1250 nonmember Fellows.
RESULTS: Obstetrician-gynecologists are aware of the nature of domestic violence and are familiar with common symptomatology that may be associated with domestic violence. For pregnant patients, 39% of respondents routinely screen at the first prenatal visit; 27% of respondents routinely screen nonpregnant patients at the initial visit. Screening is most likely to occur when the obstetrician-gynecologist suspects a patient is being abused, both during pregnancy (68%) and when the patient is not pregnant (72%). Only 30% of obstetrician-gynecologists received training on domestic violence during medical school; 37% received such instruction during residency training. The majority (67%) have received continuing education on the subject. Years since training and personal experiences with intimate-partner violence were associated with increased screening practices.
CONCLUSION: Routine screening of all women for domestic violence has been recommended by ACOG for more than a decade. The majority of obstetrician-gynecologists screen both pregnant and nonpregnant patients when they suspect abuse. However, with universal screening, more female victims of violence can be identified and can receive needed services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9794669     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00247-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  16 in total

1.  Physicians' screening practices for female partner abuse during prenatal visits.

Authors:  L Chamberlain; K A Perham-Hester
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-06

2.  Violence against women and reproductive health: toward defining a role for reproductive health care services.

Authors:  L Parsons; M M Goodwin; R Petersen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-06

3.  Pregnancy intention and pregnancy happiness: are they different?

Authors:  M R Sable; M K Libbus
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-09

4.  In person versus computer screening for intimate partner violence among pregnant patients.

Authors:  Judy C Chang; Diane Dado; Sara Schussler; Lynn Hawker; Cynthia L Holland; Jessica G Burke; Patricia A Cluss
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-07-06

5.  A comparison of maternal interview and medical record ascertainment of violence among women who had poor pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Lise E Fried; Ann Aschengrau; Howard Cabral; Hortensia Amaro
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-06-27

6.  Disparities in intimate partner violence prenatal counseling: setting a baseline for the implementation of the Guidelines for Women's Preventive Services.

Authors:  Van M Ta Park; Donald K Hayes; Janice Humphreys
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2014-05

7.  Police-reported intimate partner violence during pregnancy and the risk of antenatal hospitalization.

Authors:  Sherry Lipsky; Victoria L Holt; Thomas R Easterling; Cathy W Critchlow
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2004-06

8.  Intimate partner violence screening and pregnant Latinas.

Authors:  Michael Rodriguez; Jan Shoultz; Erin Richardson
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2009

Review 9.  Acknowledging a persistent truth: domestic violence in pregnancy.

Authors:  Joanna Cook; Susan Bewley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Reducing psychosocial and behavioral pregnancy risk factors: results of a randomized clinical trial among high-risk pregnant african american women.

Authors:  Jill G Joseph; Ayman A E El-Mohandes; Michele Kiely; M Nabil El-Khorazaty; Marie G Gantz; Allan A Johnson; Kathy S Katz; Susan M Blake; Maryann W Rossi; Siva Subramanian
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.