Literature DB >> 9794345

Coronary blood flow dynamics during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for stable angina pectoris associated with severe narrowing of one major coronary artery.

G A Jessurun1, R A Tio, M J De Jongste, R W Hautvast, P Den Heijer, H J Crijns.   

Abstract

To study the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on coronary vasomotion, patients with New York Heart Association class III angina pectoris and significant single-vessel left coronary artery disease and who were also scheduled for elective percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, were allocated to a study group (precordial actual TENS, n = 10) and a control group (precordial simulated TENS, n = 5, and TENS on the back, n = 3). Coronary volumetric flow was assessed in the stenotic and nonstenotic coronary artery before and after neurostimulation. The diameter (in millimeters) of the stenotic coronary artery was reduced in the study group after actual TENS (from 2.73 +/- 0.55 by 0.12 +/- 0.11; p = 0.008). In the nonstenotic coronary artery, the diameter increased in the study group (from 2.64 +/- 0.43 by 0.24 +/- 0.15; p = 0.01). In both the stenotic and nonstenotic coronary arteries, no effect was shown on the average peak velocity (centimeters per second) in the study group. The coronary volumetric flow (milliliters per minute) was reduced in the stenotic artery of the study group (from 62 +/- 18 by 8 +/- 7; p = 0.007). In the nonstenotic coronary artery, volumetric flow increased in the study group (from 57 +/- 18 by 11 +/- 10; p = 0.007). In the control group, simulated TENS and TENS on the back had no effect on the diameter of the artery, average peak velocity, or volumetric flow. In addition, in all patients, TENS had no effect on the total volumetric flow of the left coronary artery and hemodynamic variables during the study period. This observation suggests that TENS modulates regional coronary vasomotion in patients with coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9794345     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00506-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Neurostimulation treatment for angina pectoris.

Authors:  S Murray; P D Collins; M A James
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The effect of electrical neurostimulation on collateral perfusion.

Authors:  J de Vries; R L Anthonio; M J L DeJongste; G A Jessurun; R A Tio; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  The effect of electrical neurostimulation on collateral perfusion during acute coronary occlusion.

Authors:  Jessica de Vries; Rutger L Anthonio; Mike J L Dejongste; Gillian A Jessurun; Eng-Shiong Tan; Bart J G L de Smet; Ad F M van den Heuvel; Michiel J Staal; Felix Zijlstra
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Angina (RASCAL Study): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sam Eldabe; Simon Thomson; Rui Duarte; Morag Brookes; Mark deBelder; Jon Raphael; Ed Davies; Rod Taylor
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2015-09-21

Review 5.  The Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulators on End Organ Perfusion: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Harneel S Saini; Mina Shnoda; Ishveen Saini; Matthew Sayre; Shahzaib Tariq
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-03-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.