L S Wissow1, D Roter, L J Bauman, E Crain, C Kercsmar, K Weiss, H Mitchell, B Mohr. 1. Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. Lwissow@jhsph.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Poor children's reliance on emergency facilities is one factor implicated in the rise of morbidity attributed to asthma. Although studies have examined doctor-patient communication during routine pediatric visits, little data are available about communication during emergency care. This study sought to describe communication during emergency treatment of childhood asthma to learn if a "patient-centered" provider style was associated with increased parent satisfaction and increased parent and child participation. METHODS: This cross-sectional, observational study examined 104 children aged 4 to 9 years and their guardian(s) attending emergency departments in seven cities. Quantitative analysis of provider-family dialogue was performed. Questionnaires measured satisfaction with care, provider informativeness, and partnership. RESULTS: Providers' talk to children was largely supportive and directive; parents received most counseling and information. Children spoke little to providers (mean: 20 statements per visit versus 156 by parents). Providers made few statements about psychosocial aspects of asthma care (mean: three per visit). Providers' patient-centered style with parents was associated with more talk from parents and higher ratings for informativeness and partnership. Patient-centered style with children was associated with five times the amount of talk from children and with higher parent ratings for "good care," but not for informativeness or partnership. CONCLUSIONS: Communication during emergency asthma care was overwhelmingly biomedical. Children took little part in discussions. A patient-centered style correlated with increased parent and child participation, but required directing conversation toward both parents and children.
OBJECTIVES: Poor children's reliance on emergency facilities is one factor implicated in the rise of morbidity attributed to asthma. Although studies have examined doctor-patient communication during routine pediatric visits, little data are available about communication during emergency care. This study sought to describe communication during emergency treatment of childhood asthma to learn if a "patient-centered" provider style was associated with increased parent satisfaction and increased parent and child participation. METHODS: This cross-sectional, observational study examined 104 children aged 4 to 9 years and their guardian(s) attending emergency departments in seven cities. Quantitative analysis of provider-family dialogue was performed. Questionnaires measured satisfaction with care, provider informativeness, and partnership. RESULTS: Providers' talk to children was largely supportive and directive; parents received most counseling and information. Children spoke little to providers (mean: 20 statements per visit versus 156 by parents). Providers made few statements about psychosocial aspects of asthma care (mean: three per visit). Providers' patient-centered style with parents was associated with more talk from parents and higher ratings for informativeness and partnership. Patient-centered style with children was associated with five times the amount of talk from children and with higher parent ratings for "good care," but not for informativeness or partnership. CONCLUSIONS: Communication during emergency asthma care was overwhelmingly biomedical. Children took little part in discussions. A patient-centered style correlated with increased parent and child participation, but required directing conversation toward both parents and children.
Authors: Elizabeth D Cox; Kirstin A Nackers; Henry N Young; Megan A Moreno; Joseph F Levy; Rita M Mangione-Smith Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2011-11-08
Authors: Betsy Sleath; Delesha M Carpenter; Scott A Davis; Claire Hayes Watson; Charles Lee; Ceila E Loughlin; Nacire Garcia; Daniel S Reuland; Gail Tudor Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2018-01-31
Authors: Jessica M Valenzuela; Laura B Smith; Jeanette M Stafford; Ralph B D'Agostino; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce P Yi-Frazier; Michael Seid; Lawrence M Dolan Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2014-09
Authors: L Ebony Boulware; Patti L Ephraim; Felicia Hill-Briggs; Debra L Roter; Lee R Bone; Jennifer L Wolff; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; David M Levine; Raquel C Greer; Deidra C Crews; Kimberly A Gudzune; Michael C Albert; Hema C Ramamurthi; Jessica M Ameling; Clemontina A Davenport; Hui-Jie Lee; Jane F Pendergast; Nae-Yuh Wang; Kathryn A Carson; Valerie Sneed; Debra J Gayles; Sarah J Flynn; Dwyan Monroe; Debra Hickman; Leon Purnell; Michelle Simmons; Annette Fisher; Nicole DePasquale; Jeanne Charleston; Hanan J Aboutamar; Ashley N Cabacungan; Lisa A Cooper Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Charles R Jonassaint; Carlton Haywood; Philip Todd Korthuis; Lisa A Cooper; Somnath Saha; Victoria Sharp; Jonathon Cohn; Richard D Moore; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2013-01-15