S M Borowitz1, J C Wyatt. 1. Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908, USA. Witz@Virginia.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: Despite the common use of e-mail, little beyond anecdote or impressions has been published on patient-clinician e-mail consultation. OBJECTIVE: To report our experiences with free-of-charge e-mail consultations. DESIGN: Retrospective review of all e-mail consultation requests received between November 1, 1995, and June 31, 1998. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive e-mail consultation requests sent to the Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology at the Children's Medical Center of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of consultation requests per month, time required to respond, who initiated the request and their geographic origin, and the kind of information requested in the consultation. RESULTS: During the 33-month period studied, we received 1239 requests, an average (SD) of 37.6 (15.9) each month. A total of 1001 consultation requests (81%) were initiated by parents, relatives, or guardians, 126 (10%) by physicians, and 112 (9%) by other health care professionals. Consultation requests were received from 39 states and 37 other countries. In 855 requests (69%), there was a specific question about the cause of a particular child's symptoms, diagnostic tests, and/or therapeutic interventions. In 112 (9%), the requester sought a second opinion about diagnosis or treatment for a particular child, and 272 consultations (22%) requested general information concerning a disorder, treatment, or medication without reference to a particular child. A total of 1078 requests (87%) were answered within 48 hours of the initial request. On average, reading and responding to each e-mail took slightly less than 4 minutes. CONCLUSION: E-mail provides a means for parents, guardians, and health care professionals to obtain patient and disease-specific information from selected medical consultants in a timely manner.
CONTEXT: Despite the common use of e-mail, little beyond anecdote or impressions has been published on patient-clinician e-mail consultation. OBJECTIVE: To report our experiences with free-of-charge e-mail consultations. DESIGN: Retrospective review of all e-mail consultation requests received between November 1, 1995, and June 31, 1998. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive e-mail consultation requests sent to the Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology at the Children's Medical Center of the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of consultation requests per month, time required to respond, who initiated the request and their geographic origin, and the kind of information requested in the consultation. RESULTS: During the 33-month period studied, we received 1239 requests, an average (SD) of 37.6 (15.9) each month. A total of 1001 consultation requests (81%) were initiated by parents, relatives, or guardians, 126 (10%) by physicians, and 112 (9%) by other health care professionals. Consultation requests were received from 39 states and 37 other countries. In 855 requests (69%), there was a specific question about the cause of a particular child's symptoms, diagnostic tests, and/or therapeutic interventions. In 112 (9%), the requester sought a second opinion about diagnosis or treatment for a particular child, and 272 consultations (22%) requested general information concerning a disorder, treatment, or medication without reference to a particular child. A total of 1078 requests (87%) were answered within 48 hours of the initial request. On average, reading and responding to each e-mail took slightly less than 4 minutes. CONCLUSION: E-mail provides a means for parents, guardians, and health care professionals to obtain patient and disease-specific information from selected medical consultants in a timely manner.
Authors: N Maglaveras; I Chouvarda; V Koutkias; I Lekka; M Tsakali; S Tsetoglou; S Maglavera; L Leondaridis; B Zeevi; V Danelli; T Kotis; G De Moore; E A Balas Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2003