Literature DB >> 9794168

Socioeconomic status and cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs: a comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, California (United States).

L Liu1, D Deapen, L Bernstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite the fact that socioeconomic status (SES) has been shown to have important implications in health related issues, population-based cancer registries in the United States do not routinely collect SES information. This study presents a model to estimate the SES of cancer patients in the registry database.
METHODS: At the Los Angeles Cancer Surveillance Program (CSP), we developed a model to estimate each cancer patient's SES from aggregate measurements of the census tract of residence (n = 1,640) at time of diagnosis. We then applied the SES estimates to observe the relationship between SES and risk of cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs including cancers of the ovary, cervix uteri, and corpus uteri. The analyses were performed on the cumulative records (n = 127,819) of cancer patients diagnosed between 1972 and 1992 in Los Angeles County, California, for the mutually exclusive racial/ethnic groups of non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanic Whites, Blacks, Asians, and persons of other ethnic groups.
RESULTS: We found SES is positively associated with female breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and cancer of the corpus uteri, but inversely associated with cervical cancer. These SES trends were quite consistent across age groups among non-Hispanic White women. Variations by race/ethnicity in the SES patterns were also found, with Asians exhibiting little association.
CONCLUSIONS: Our model of measuring SES is sufficiently sensitive to capture the trends. Adopting the aggregate approach to measure SES in population-based registry data appears to be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9794168     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008811432436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  43 in total

1.  Is breast cancer a disease of affluence, poverty, or both? The case of African American women.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Cancer-related health disparities in women.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Robert T Croyle; Veronica Y Chollette; Vivian W Pinn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Violence Victimization, Social Support, and Papanicolaou Smear Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study from Adolescence to Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Hsing-Fang Hsieh; Justin E Heinze; Ian Lang; Ritesh Mistry; Anne Buu; Marc A Zimmerman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Socioeconomic Status in Relation to the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in African-American Women: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Patricia G Moorman; Sydnee Crankshaw; Frances Wang; Elisa V Bandera; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Melissa Bondy; Kathleen B Cartmell; Michelle L Cote; Marvella E Ford; Ellen Funkhouser; Linda E Kelemen; Edward S Peters; Ann G Schwartz; Katherine Regan Sterba; Paul Terry; Kristin Wallace; Joellen M Schildkraut
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Decompositions of the Contribution of Treatment Disparities to Survival Disparities in Stage I-II Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Douglas S Swords; Courtney L Scaife
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Does socioeconomic status account for racial and ethnic disparities in childhood cancer survival?

Authors:  Rebecca D Kehm; Logan G Spector; Jenny N Poynter; David M Vock; Sean F Altekruse; Theresa L Osypuk
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Does socioeconomic disparity in cancer incidence vary across racial/ethnic groups?

Authors:  Daixin Yin; Cyllene Morris; Mark Allen; Rosemary Cress; Janet Bates; Lihua Liu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Neighborhood socioeconomic status influences the survival of elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndromes in the United States.

Authors:  Rong Wang; Cary P Gross; Stephanie Halene; Xiaomei Ma
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Trends in childhood brain tumor incidence, 1973-2009.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Pedram Razavi; Jessica Barrington-Trimis; Rachel Tobias Baldwin; Shahab Asgharzadeh; Myles Cockburn; Tarik Tihan; Susan Preston-Martin
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study.

Authors:  Limin X Clegg; Marsha E Reichman; Barry A Miller; Benjamin F Hankey; Gopal K Singh; Yi Dan Lin; Marc T Goodman; Charles F Lynch; Stephen M Schwartz; Vivien W Chen; Leslie Bernstein; Scarlett L Gomez; John J Graff; Charles C Lin; Norman J Johnson; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.