BACKGROUND: There are controversies concerning the necessity of pre-school vision screening. AIM OF THE STUDY: evaluation of the prevalence of pathologic ophthalmologic findings in kindergarten children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1030 families were offered a vision screening. Of these, a total of 948 children, aged 3 to 6 years, voluntarily underwent a screening for strabismus, amblyopia and refractive anomalies. The examination was performed in the kindergarten in the absence of the parents. METHODS OF EXAMINATION: A questionnaire concerning general and ophthalmologic history of the child and of the family was evaluated. Visual acuity, cover-uncover-test, Lang-stereotest, retinoscopy, ophthalmoscopy (undilated pupils) were performed and the glasses were evaluated. RESULTS: The screening was highly accepted by the parents and 92% of the families (n = 948) took part. The compliance of the children was very good. A total of 38.7% (n = 381) of the children showed one or more abnormal parameters. 21.4% (n = 229) showed a reduced visual acuity. Strabismus was found in 3.7%. Half of the children with abnormal findings already had had a vision screening, but only 25% had received ophthalmologic treatment. Of those who possessed glasses, 25% came without them, and another 25% had a reduced visual acuity even with their glasses. The main problems were many false-positive results and high costs. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmologic and orthoptic screening in kindergarten is technically easy and conclusive in experienced hands. Ideas to reduce costs and to avoid overreferrals are an age-related lowering of the visual acuity limit and a rescreening of suspected children in a screening-setting a second time before sending them to an ophthalmologist. Another possibility to reduce costs would be to perform examinations not by ophthalmologists but by "screening-orthoptists" who should be trained in retinoscopy and ophthalmoscopy.
BACKGROUND: There are controversies concerning the necessity of pre-school vision screening. AIM OF THE STUDY: evaluation of the prevalence of pathologic ophthalmologic findings in kindergarten children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 1030 families were offered a vision screening. Of these, a total of 948 children, aged 3 to 6 years, voluntarily underwent a screening for strabismus, amblyopia and refractive anomalies. The examination was performed in the kindergarten in the absence of the parents. METHODS OF EXAMINATION: A questionnaire concerning general and ophthalmologic history of the child and of the family was evaluated. Visual acuity, cover-uncover-test, Lang-stereotest, retinoscopy, ophthalmoscopy (undilated pupils) were performed and the glasses were evaluated. RESULTS: The screening was highly accepted by the parents and 92% of the families (n = 948) took part. The compliance of the children was very good. A total of 38.7% (n = 381) of the children showed one or more abnormal parameters. 21.4% (n = 229) showed a reduced visual acuity. Strabismus was found in 3.7%. Half of the children with abnormal findings already had had a vision screening, but only 25% had received ophthalmologic treatment. Of those who possessed glasses, 25% came without them, and another 25% had a reduced visual acuity even with their glasses. The main problems were many false-positive results and high costs. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmologic and orthoptic screening in kindergarten is technically easy and conclusive in experienced hands. Ideas to reduce costs and to avoid overreferrals are an age-related lowering of the visual acuity limit and a rescreening of suspected children in a screening-setting a second time before sending them to an ophthalmologist. Another possibility to reduce costs would be to perform examinations not by ophthalmologists but by "screening-orthoptists" who should be trained in retinoscopy and ophthalmoscopy.
Authors: Heike M Elflein; Laura Krause; Alexander Rommel; Michael S Urschitz; Norbert Pfeiffer; Alexander K Schuster Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 1.059
Authors: Anna Budai; András Czigler; Eszter Mikó-Baráth; Vanda A Nemes; Gábor Horváth; Ágota Pusztai; David P Piñero; Gábor Jandó Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Heike M Elflein; Roman Pokora; Denis F Müller; Klaus Jahn; Katharina A Ponto; Susanne Pitz; Norbert Pfeiffer; Alexander K Schuster; Michael S Urschitz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 3.390