Literature DB >> 9793863

An in vitro study of the correlation between aortic valve diameter and mitral intertrigonal distance: a simple method to select the correct mitral annuloplasty ring size.

S J Choo1, J Olomon, C Bowles, H H Luo, D Pang, J H Oury, C M Duran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: The application of the flexible Duran mitral annuloplasty ring in the treatment of various mitral valvular diseases is a physiologically appealing method of surgical repair. However, accurate identification of the trigonal structures, which is crucial in selecting the proper ring size, cannot always be made with certainty. A method is proposed to calculate the intertrigonal distance (ITD) from the aortic diameter.
METHODS: Using digital calipers, the linear intertrigonal distance was measured in human homograft (n = 10) and sheep (n = 10) aortic root specimens. The aortic diameter was obtained from the circumference of the pressurized aortic root. A conversion factor was acquired for each specimen by dividing the aortic diameter with the measured ITD. A single constant conversion factor, which closely approximated the mean of the conversion factors in both groups, was then applied broadly to derive the ITD by calculation from the aortic diameter, which is known. The validity of using this constant conversion factor was tested by comparing the degree of variation of the calculated ITD from the direct measurements of the ITD.
RESULTS: The mean of the conversion factors was 0.79 and 0.80 in the human and the sheep roots, respectively. The value 0.80 was used as the constant conversion factor in both groups for calculating the ITD. A paired comparison t-test in each group showed the difference between the calculated intertrigonal distance and the direct measurements of the ITD to be insignificant, validating the use of 0.80 as a constant conversion factor.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study suggest that the conversion factor of 0.80 can be reliably used to obtain a calculated value of the intertrigonal distance; this method has the potential to aid the surgeon in determining the intertrigonal distance and the proper ring size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9793863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  5 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology of ischemic mitral insufficiency: does repair make a difference?

Authors:  Joseph H Gorman; Liam P Ryan; Robert C Gorman
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Abnormal mitral-aortic intervalvular coupling in mitral valve diseases: a study using real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  Jen-Li Looi; Alex Pui-Wai Lee; Fang Fang; Ming C Hsiung; Jing-Ping Sun; Wei-Hsian Yin; Jeng Wei; Shen-Kou Tsai; Song Wan; Randolph Hl Wong; Malcolm J Underwood; Qing-Shan Lin; Chun-Na Jin; Liu Chen; Cheuk-Man Yu
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Sizing the mitral annulus in healthy subjects and patients with mitral regurgitation: 2D versus 3D measurements from cardiac CT.

Authors:  Sonja Gordic; Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim; Robert Manka; Simon Sündermann; Thomas Frauenfelder; Francesco Maisano; Volkmar Falk; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Dynamic changes in the ischemic mitral annulus: Implications for ring sizing.

Authors:  Khurram Owais; Mario Montealegre-Gallegos; Jelliffe Jeganathan; Robina Matyal; Kamal R Khabbaz; Feroze Mahmood
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

5.  Successful mitral repair in dogs by mitral annuloplasty using Hegar dilator: two case reports.

Authors:  Won-Jong Lee; Junyoung Kim; Chang-Hwan Moon; TaeHeum Eom; DongJu Son; Seungmin Lee; Haebeom Lee; Seong-Mok Jeong; Dae-Hyun Kim
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 1.672

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.