G Le Coq1, B Ducot, D Benhamou. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, Clamart, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the causes of failure of epidural analgesia during labour and delivery. METHODS: During six months, pregnant patients receiving epidural analgesia and delivering vaginally were studied prospectively. Bupivacaine 0.125% was used for the initial bolus dose and subsequent continuous infusion. Top-ups of the same solution were used for inadequate pain relief assessed using a visual analogue pain score (VAPS) and/or by clinical examination. Inadequate pain relief was defined as the need for > or = 2 top-ups in addition to epidural infusion and failure during delivery as VAPS > or = 30 mm during the expulsion phase. RESULTS: 1009 patients delivered during this period, 596 had epidural analgesia for vaginal delivery of a live infant and data were complete in 456. Inadequate pain relief during labour and during delivery were found in 5.3% and 19.7% of patients. Risk factors of inadequate pain relief included: inadequate analgesic efficacy of the first dose (Odds ratio: 3.5, P = 0.001) and posterior presentation (Odds ratio: 5.6, P = 0.001). Radicular pain during epidural placement was associated with failure during labour (Odds ratio: 3.9, P = 0.05). Duration of epidural analgesia > six hours (Odds ratio: 9.1, P = 0.001) was a risk factor for insufficient pain relief during labour whereas duration of epidural analgesia < one hour was associated with pain during delivery (Odds ratio: 18.3, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Several obstetrical and epidural-related factors increase the risk of inadequate epidural analgesia. For some, simple changes of practice pattern may lead to improved pain relief.
PURPOSE: To determine the causes of failure of epidural analgesia during labour and delivery. METHODS: During six months, pregnant patients receiving epidural analgesia and delivering vaginally were studied prospectively. Bupivacaine 0.125% was used for the initial bolus dose and subsequent continuous infusion. Top-ups of the same solution were used for inadequate pain relief assessed using a visual analogue pain score (VAPS) and/or by clinical examination. Inadequate pain relief was defined as the need for > or = 2 top-ups in addition to epidural infusion and failure during delivery as VAPS > or = 30 mm during the expulsion phase. RESULTS: 1009 patients delivered during this period, 596 had epidural analgesia for vaginal delivery of a live infant and data were complete in 456. Inadequate pain relief during labour and during delivery were found in 5.3% and 19.7% of patients. Risk factors of inadequate pain relief included: inadequate analgesic efficacy of the first dose (Odds ratio: 3.5, P = 0.001) and posterior presentation (Odds ratio: 5.6, P = 0.001). Radicular pain during epidural placement was associated with failure during labour (Odds ratio: 3.9, P = 0.05). Duration of epidural analgesia > six hours (Odds ratio: 9.1, P = 0.001) was a risk factor for insufficient pain relief during labour whereas duration of epidural analgesia < one hour was associated with pain during delivery (Odds ratio: 18.3, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Several obstetrical and epidural-related factors increase the risk of inadequate epidural analgesia. For some, simple changes of practice pattern may lead to improved pain relief.
Authors: Alireza Mehrtash; Mehran Pesteie; Jorden Hetherington; Peter A Behringer; Tina Kapur; William M Wells; Robert Rohling; Andriy Fedorov; Purang Abolmaesumi Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2017-03-03
Authors: Mehran Pesteie; Purang Abolmaesumi; Hussam Al-Deen Ashab; Victoria A Lessoway; Simon Massey; Vit Gunka; Robert N Rohling Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: John Song En Lee; Rehena Sultana; Nian Lin Reena Han; Alex Tiong Heng Sia; Ban Leong Sng Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 2.217