Literature DB >> 9793104

Inappropriate shocks delivered by an ICD as a result of sensed potentials from a transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation unit.

D M Philbin1, M A Marieb, K H Aithal, M H Schoenfeld.   

Abstract

Although the potential for transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation (TENS) units to interfere with appropriate function of cardiac pacemakers is well documented, an adverse interaction between a TENS unit and an ICD has never been reported. We describe a patient in whom a TENS unit created an electrical artifact that was interpreted by a transvenous ICD as ventricular fibrillation, leading to the delivery of inappropriate therapy. TENS units should be used with caution in patients with ICDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9793104     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00027.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

1.  ELECTROPHYSICAL AGENTS - Contraindications And Precautions: An Evidence-Based Approach To Clinical Decision Making In Physical Therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Multiple inappropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator therapies in rapid succession.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Marbach; Colin Yeo; Martin S Green; Girish M Nair
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2017-10-23

3.  The safety of electrical stimulation in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A systematic review.

Authors:  James Badger; Paul Taylor; Ian Swain
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2017-12-05

4.  An "UninTENSional" Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Shock.

Authors:  Suzette L Turner; Sheldon M Singh
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2018-11-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.