Literature DB >> 9790783

Complications related to indwelling caval catheters on a gynecologic oncology service.

D F Silver1, R E Hempling, F O Recio, M S Piver, G H Eltabbakh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of complications of indwelling caval catheter (ICC) use on a gynecologic oncology service and to compare complication rates between subcutaneous ports and external catheters.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 185 patients who underwent 216 ICC placements between April 1, 1987 and April 1, 1997, was performed. Patient and catheter characteristics were analyzed as they related to the rate of pneumothorax, bacteremia, and deep neck and thoracic vein thrombosis (DNVT).
RESULTS: A total of 216 ICCs were placed including 152 implanted ports and 64 external catheters. Pneumothorax occurred in 2% of ICC insertions. Bacteremia complicated 16% of ICCs. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that external catheters (P < 0.01) and neutropenia (P < 0.01) were independent risk factors for bacteremia. DNVT complicated 6% of ICCs and was observed significantly (P < 0.02) more frequently among 11 catheters placed in patients with clear cell malignancies of the female reproductive tract. Unplanned catheter removal occurred significantly (P < 0.01) more frequently among patients with external catheters compared to implanted devices.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantable ICCs appear to offer a significant advantage compared to external devices with regard to the development of bacteremia and unplanned catheter removal. Though catheter type, neutropenia, and TPN are associated with an increased incidence of bacteremia, multivariate analysis does not include TPN as an independent risk factor for ICC-related bacteremia. A significant increase in the rate of DNVT among a small number of patients with clear cell gynecologic malignancies warrants further study. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790783     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  4 in total

1.  Choosing the appropriate side for subcutaneous port catheter placement in patients with mastectomy: ipsilateral or contralateral?

Authors:  Omer Fatih Nas; Kadir Hacikurt; Ahmet Kaya; Nurullah Dogan; Bekir Sanal; Guven Ozkaya; Halit Ziya Dundar; Cuneyt Erdogan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Protocol for the implantation of a venous access device (Port-A-Cath System). The complications and solutions found in 560 cases.

Authors:  Luis Yeste Sánchez; José M Galbis Caravajal; Carlos A Fuster Diana; Enrique Moledo Eiras
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Does the Implantation Technique for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports (TIVAPs) Influence Long-Term Outcome?

Authors:  Daniele Biacchi; Paolo Sammartino; Simone Sibio; Fabio Accarpio; Maurizio Cardi; Paolo Sapienza; Alessandro De Cesare; Joseph Maher Fouad Atta; Alessio Impagnatiello; Angelo Di Giorgio
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The risk of bloodstream infection associated with totally implantable venous access ports in cancer patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meng Jiang; Chang-Li Li; Chun-Qiu Pan; Li Yu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.