Literature DB >> 9790707

The effect of background cuing on prey detection.

.   

Abstract

Studies of prey detection have typically focused on how search image affects the capture of cryptic items. This study also considers how background vegetation influences cryptic prey detection. Blue jays, Cyanocitta cristata, searched digitized images for two Catocala moths: C. ilia, which is cryptic on oak, and C. relicta, which is cryptic on birch. Some images contained moths while others did not. The ability of blue jays to detect prey during repeated presentations of one prey type within a session was compared with their performance during randomly alternating presentations of both prey types within a session to examine search-image formation under two background conditions (informative and ambiguous). In the informative background condition, both trees in the image were of the same species and therefore, the background was a reliable indicator of which prey type might be present. In the ambiguous background condition, there was one tree of each species in the image and either prey type could be present. The results indicate that: (1) a search-image effect was observed only for the more cryptic prey type and only when the background was informative; (2) as accuracy on prey images (those with moths) increased, response latency remained unchanged; (3) performance on nonprey images (those without moths) was primarily determined by the difficulty of searching the background and not by the prey type in the accompanying prey images; and (4) search-image effects disappeared with extended practice. These results suggest that the ability to detect prey is influenced by background and that the presence of either multiple backgrounds or multiple prey types interferes with search-image formation. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790707     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  6 in total

1.  Visual search and attention in blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata): Associative cuing and sequential priming.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Alan B Bond; Marianna Burks; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Visual Foraging With Fingers and Eye Gaze.

Authors:  Ómar I Jóhannesson; Ian M Thornton; Irene J Smith; Andrey Chetverikov; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-03-17

3.  Evidence for object-place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Julia E Schroeder
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 1.926

4.  Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; Alice E Lown; Anna E Hughes; Martin Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Common attentional constraints in visual foraging.

Authors:  Árni Kristjánsson; Ómar I Jóhannesson; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Camouflage strategies interfere differently with observer search images.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; John Skelhorn; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.349

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.