Literature DB >> 9790702

Roost selection in the pipistrelle bat, Pipistrellus pipistrellus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), in northeast Scotland.

.   

Abstract

Availability of suitable roost sites may limit bat distribution and abundance. We compared nine internal and 26 external features of 21 known roost buildings with those of 17 random buildings in northeast Scotland, U.K. (57 degreesN) to assess whether pipistrelle bats, Pipistrellus pipistrellus (55-kHz phonotype) are selective in their use of roosts. Bats did not select roosts with specific structural attributes. Compared with random buildings, roosts were closer to a tree over 10 m tall and had a greater percentage cover (of trees over 10 m tall) within a radius of 50 m. Trees may provide benefits by providing shelter and thus ameliorating the microclimate of the roost. Cover may also provide protection from predators so that bats are able to emerge earlier, thus increasing foraging time. Bats in the present study emerged 11 min earlier from roosts with 29% cover than from roosts with 3% cover, potentially gaining as much as 10% of their daily energy requirements in this extra time. Roosts were also more likely to have linear vegetation elements leading away from them. These features may be important for navigation, foraging or predator avoidance. Compared with random buildings roosts were closer to and surrounded by a greater area of deciduous woodland within a radius of 0.5 km, had a greater area of coniferous woodland within a radius of 0.5 km, and were more likely to be found within 0.5 km of a major river. All these factors are likely to be beneficial for foraging. A logistic regression model indicated that percentage cover within 50 m of the building was the best predictor of the presence or absence of bats roosting in a building. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790702     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  8 in total

1.  Supply determines demand: influence of partner quality and quantity on the interactions between bats and pitcher plants.

Authors:  Caroline R Schöner; Michael G Schöner; Gerald Kerth; T Ulmar Grafe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Temples and bats in a homogeneous agriculture landscape: Importance of microhabitat availability, disturbance and land use for bat conservation.

Authors:  T Ganesh; A Saravanan; M Mathivanan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Recolonization of bat roost by bat bugs (Cimex pipistrelli): could parasite load be a cause of bat roost switching?

Authors:  Tomáš Bartonička; Lucie Růžičková
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Habitat composition and connectivity predicts bat presence and activity at foraging sites in a large UK conurbation.

Authors:  James D Hale; Alison J Fairbrass; Tom J Matthews; Jon P Sadler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Predicting Species Distributions Using Record Centre Data: Multi-Scale Modelling of Habitat Suitability for Bat Roosts.

Authors:  Chloe Bellamy; John Altringham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Bats of a gender flock together: sexual segregation in a subtropical bat.

Authors:  Eran Levin; Uri Roll; Amit Dolev; Yoram Yom-Tov; Noga Kronfeld-Shcor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Differential responses of cryptic bat species to the urban landscape.

Authors:  Paul R Lintott; Kate Barlow; Nils Bunnefeld; Philip Briggs; Clara Gajas Roig; Kirsty J Park
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Roost selection by Mauritian tomb bats (Taphozus mauritianus) in Lilongwe city, Malawi - importance of woodland for sustainable urban planning.

Authors:  Kieran D O'Malley; William E Kunin; Matthew Town; William O Mgoola; Emma Louise Stone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.