Literature DB >> 9790393

The relationship between abnormal glucose tolerance and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in healthy nulliparous women. Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group.

G M Joffe1, J R Esterlitz, R J Levine, J D Clemens, M G Ewell, B M Sibai, P M Catalano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study's aim was to determine whether healthy nulliparous women with abnormal glucose tolerance during pregnancy are at increased risk for development of pregnancy-associated hypertension or preeclampsia. STUDY
DESIGN: A series of 4589 healthy nulliparous women from 5 university centers were evaluated prospectively to determine whether calcium supplementation would prevent preeclampsia. Pregnancy-associated hypertension was a diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg on 2 occasions 4 hours to 1 week apart. Pregnancy-associated proteinuria was proteinuria > or = 1+ by dipstick testing on 2 occasions 4 hours to 1 week apart, proteinuria > or = 300 mg/24 h, a protein to creatinine ratio of > or = 0.35, or a single dipstick measurement of > or = 2+. Preeclampsia was defined as pregnancy-associated hypertension and pregnancy-associated proteinuria documented within 7 days of each other. Normal glucose tolerance was a plasma glucose level < 140 mg/dL 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challenge. Abnormal glucose tolerance was a plasma glucose level > or = 140 mg/dL 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challenge followed by a 3-hour 100-g oral glucose tolerance test yielding < 2 abnormal values. Gestational diabetes mellitus was a plasma glucose level > or = 200 mg/dL 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challenge in the absence of an oral glucose tolerance test or > or = 2 abnormal plasma glucose values in a 3-hour 100-g oral glucose tolerance test (> or = 105 mg/dL fasting, > or = 190 mg/dL at 1 hour, > or = 165 mg/dL at 2 hours, or > or = 145 mg/dL at 3 hours). For purposes of this study women with preeclampsia were excluded from the category of pregnancy-associated hypertension.
RESULTS: Calcium supplementation did not prevent pregnancy-associated hypertension or preeclampsia. Of 3689 women with complete glucose testing data, 227 (6%) had abnormal glucose tolerance and 81 (2%) had gestational diabetes mellitus. Compared with women with normal glucose tolerance, women with abnormal glucose tolerance were significantly older, had greater body mass index, and were more likely to be white non-Hispanic, to smoke, and to have private medical insurance. Among women with gestational diabetes mellitus, after adjustment for clinical center the relative risks of preeclampsia and of all hypertensive disorders were increased (relative risk 1.67, 95% confidence interval 0.92-3.05, and relative risk 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.28-2.11, respectively). Risk ratios were not substantially reduced after further adjustment for race and body mass index (odds ratios 1.41 and 1.48, respectively). Even within the normal range, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the level of plasma glucose 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challenge was an important predictor of preeclampsia.
CONCLUSION: Even within the normal range, the level of plasma glucose 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challenge was positively correlated with the likelihood of preeclampsia. Women with gestational diabetes mellitus were at increased risk for hypertensive disorders during pregnancy after adjustment for clinical center, race, and body mass index, although the increase was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that insulin resistance may play a role in the pathogenesis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790393     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70210-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  48 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and maternal biologic markers of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Jacques Massé; Yves Giguère; Abdelaziz Kharfi; Joël Girouard; Jean-Claude Forest
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Perinatal outcomes of Southeast Asians with pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus or preeclampsia.

Authors:  Swee May Cripe; William O'Brien; Bizu Gelaye; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-10

Review 3.  Animal models of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Eduardo Podjarny; Gyorgy Losonczy; Chris Baylis
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.299

Review 4.  Recent progress toward the understanding of the pathophysiology of hypertension during preeclampsia.

Authors:  Babbette D LaMarca; Jeffery Gilbert; Joey P Granger
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 5.  Hypertension and the pregnancy complicated by diabetes.

Authors:  Gustavo F Leguizamón; Natalia P Zeff; Alberto Fernández
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  The impact of gestational diabetes and maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring.

Authors:  P M Catalano
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Could alterations in maternal plasma visfatin concentration participate in the phenotype definition of preeclampsia and SGA?

Authors:  Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Roberto Romero; Sun Kwon Kim; Edi Vaisbuch; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Offer Erez; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Francesca Gotsch; Pooja Mittal; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Nandor Gabor Than; Ricardo Gomez; Jyh Kae Nien; Samuel S Edwin; Percy Pacora; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-08

8.  Changes in androgens and insulin sensitivity indexes throughout pregnancy in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): relationships with adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Angela Falbo; Morena Rocca; Tiziana Russo; Antonietta D'Ettore; Achille Tolino; Fulvio Zullo; Francesco Orio; Stefano Palomba
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 4.234

9.  Smoking during pregnancy and risk of abnormal glucose tolerance: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amy E Haskins; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; Penelope Pekow; Elena Carbone; Renée T Fortner; Lisa Chasan-Taber
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Fetal macrosomia and shoulder dystocia in women with gestational diabetes: risks amenable to treatment?

Authors:  Brett C Young; Jeffrey L Ecker
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.