Literature DB >> 9790374

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: the effect of previous vaginal delivery.

A B Caughey1, T D Shipp, J T Repke, C Zelop, A Cohen, E Lieherman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of order of previous modes of delivery on the rate of cesarean delivery and duration of a trial of labor among women with a history of 1 previous cesarean delivery and 1 previous vaginal delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: The medical records of 4393 women at our institution who were seen June 1984-July 1996 for a trial of labor after a previous cesarean delivery were abstracted. The 800 women with a history of 1 previous cesarean and 1 previous vaginal delivery were included in this analysis. They were split into 2 groups by obstetric history: (1) 1 cesarean delivery followed by 1 vaginal delivery (vaginal last) and (2) 1 vaginal delivery followed by 1 cesarean delivery (cesarean last). Patient characteristics, durations of labor, and rates of cesarean delivery were compared with chi2 analysis, the Student t test, and the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Possible confounding variables were controlled for with multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: The rates of cesarean delivery for the vaginal last and cesarean last groups were 7.2% and 14.7%, respectively (P = .002). The median durations of labor for the vaginal last and cesarean last groups were 5.6 and 7.0 hours, respectively (P = .01). The differences in cesarean rates and durations of labor were seen regardless of the indication for the previous cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Among women with 1 previous cesarean and 1 previous vaginal delivery, those whose most recent delivery was vaginal had a lower rate of cesarean delivery and shorter duration of labor than did those whose most recent delivery was cesarean.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790374     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70192-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Pregnancy outcome in women with previous one cesarean section.

Authors:  Lekshmi Balachandran; Pooja R Vaswani; Ramakone Mogotlane
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-02-03

2.  Can a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor?

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight J Rouse; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean section and outcomes in rural area of Anatolia.

Authors:  Mehmet Baki Senturk; Yusuf Cakmak; Halit Atac; Mehmet Sukru Budak
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-07-10

4.  Predicting vaginal birth after previous cesarean: Using machine-learning models and a population-based cohort in Sweden.

Authors:  Charlotte Lindblad Wollmann; Kyle D Hart; Can Liu; Aaron B Caughey; Olof Stephansson; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanxin Wu; Yachana Kataria; Zilian Wang; Wai-Kit Ming; Christina Ellervik
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Is Early Amniotomy Associated with Higher Likelihood of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean?

Authors:  Megan S Varvoutis; Lauren C Sayres; Sarah K Dotters-Katz
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2020-03-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.