Literature DB >> 9790360

Cost-effective delivery management of the vertex and nonvertex twin gestation.

J G Mauldin1, R B Newman, P D Mauldin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the most cost-effective delivery management of vertex and nonvertex twin pair gestations. STUDY
DESIGN: Two hundred sixty-six consecutive twin gestations were followed up prospectively in a special antepartum Twins Clinic directed by the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division. Maternal demographic, obstetric, and neonatal data were compiled prospectively. Information regarding 84 vertex and nonvertex twin pair gestations was extracted for review. Comparison groups included 41 twin pairs managed by spontaneous vaginal delivery and breech extraction (group A), 19 twin pairs managed by spontaneous vaginal delivery and external cephalic version (group B), and 24 twin pairs managed by primary cesarean delivery (group C). In-hospital financial data were retrieved and adjusted for inflation to 1996 constant dollars (data from a single institution allow comparison of charges). The Kruskal-Wallis chi2 test, the Fisher exact test, and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The 3 groups did not differ with respect to maternal demographics, medical complications, gestational age, birth weight, fetal sex, or intrauterine growth restriction. Maternal and neonatal hospital charges were both significantly lower (P = .01 and P = .0001, respectively) in the breech extraction group A ($5890 +/- $2304 and $3526 +/- $5017, respectively) than in either group B ($8638 +/- $4175 and $11,754 +/- $15,457, respectively) or group C ($7,608 +/- $3,256 and $36,994 +/- $54,318, respectively). Although maternal morbidity was similar among the 3 groups, length of stay was shorter for mothers in group A. The infants delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery and breech extraction (group A) had significantly lower rates of pulmonary disease (7% vs 24% vs 31% for groups A, B, and C, respectively; P = .002) and neonatal infectious disease (1% vs 0% vs 16%; P = .0005). These infants required the use of a ventilator less frequently (5% vs 12% vs 24%; P = .01), were more likely to be admitted to the normal newborn nursery (71% vs 51% vs 50%; P = .0001), and had a significantly shorter length of hospitalization (4.8 vs 12.4 vs 17.8 days; P = .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no medical consensus regarding delivery management for vertex and nonvertex presenting twin pairs. When hospital charges are examined with clinical data, however, breech extraction of the nonvertex second twin is the most cost-effective delivery management strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790360     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70179-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  3 in total

1.  An evidence-based approach to determining route of delivery for twin gestations.

Authors:  Diane Christopher; Barrett K Robinson; Alan M Peaceman
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011

2.  Childbirth education for multiple pregnancy: part 2: intrapartum and postpartum considerations.

Authors:  Kristen S Montgomery; Sabrina Cubera; Christie Belcher; David Patrick; Heather Funderburk; Christa Melton; Michelle Fastenau
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2005

Review 3.  Mode of delivery in non-cephalic presenting twins: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charlotte N Steins Bisschop; Tatjana E Vogelvang; Anne M May; Nico W E Schuitemaker
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.344

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.