Literature DB >> 9790324

A three-dimensional computerized mesh diagram analysis and its application in soft tissue facial morphometry.

V F Ferrario1, C Sforza, J H Schmitz, A Miani, G Serrao.   

Abstract

A modified computerized mesh diagram analysis that allows rapid and independent quantifications of soft tissue facial size and shape in the three-dimensional space is presented. Normal references are provided, and the application of the method is also exemplified by the analysis of two maxillofacial surgical patients. The Three-Dimensional Facial Morphometry method has been used for the collection of the x, y, z coordinates of 22 soft tissue landmarks in 50 men and 50 women (all healthy young white adults). The method detects the three-dimensional coordinates of retroreflective, wireless markers positioned on selected facial landmarks with two charge-coupled device cameras, working in the infrared field. The midpoint between the right and left tragus landmarks served as the origin of the coordinate axes, and the landmark coordinates were rotated, setting the intercantheal line horizontal on both the frontal and the horizontal planes, and the Camper's plane inclined at -7.5 degrees on the sagittal plane. A standardized mesh of equidistant horizontal (dimension: half the upper face width), vertical (half the vertical projection of upper face height), and anteroposterior (half the horizontal projection of upper face depth) lines was consequently constructed. The lattice was replicated on the entire face and comprised 84 parallelepipeds. Both male and female reference meshes had a harmonious and symmetric appearance, with gender differences in facial size but not in facial shape. The standard normal reference was superimposed on the patient's tracing, and the global (size plus shape) difference was then evaluated by the calculation of the relevant displacement vectors for each soft tissue landmark. A global difference factor was calculated as the sum of the modules of all the displacement vectors. Consequently, a size normalization was performed, and the shape difference (size-standardized) was then evaluated by the calculation of new relevant displacement vectors for each landmark, as well as a shape--global difference vectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790324     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70185-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Implementing a superimposition and measurement model for 3D sagittal analysis of therapy-induced changes in facial soft tissue: a pilot study.

Authors:  Claudia Sade Hoefert; Margit Bacher; Tina Herberts; Michael Krimmel; Siegmar Reinert; Sebastian Hoefert; Gernot Göz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Integration of a maxillary model into facial surface stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  T E Bechtold; T G Göz; E Schaupp; B Koos; A Godt; S Reinert; M Berneburg
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Evaluation of soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography after open reduction and internal fixation of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture.

Authors:  Dong Hyuck Kim; Rae Hyong Kim; Jun Lee; Young Deok Chee; Kyung Hwan Kwon; Kyoung-Hwan Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-06-27

4.  Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.

Authors:  M G Bozkir; P Karakas; O Oguz
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Photogrammetric Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue Profile before and after Protraction Facemask Therapy in Class III Children (6-11 Years Old).

Authors:  Vahid Moshkelgosha; Arghavan Raoof; Ahmadreza Sardarian; Parisa Salehi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-03

6.  Soft tissue facial changes among adult females during alignment stage of orthodontic treatment: a 3D geometric morphometric study.

Authors:  Si Yu Hou; Wenwen Zhou; Hongwei Dai; Hai Ming Wong; Yi Feng Wen; Jianping Zhou
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.