Literature DB >> 9790296

Nasopharyngeal swab and PCR for the screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the endemic area: a good supplement to the serologic screening.

T S Sheen1, J Y Ko, Y L Chang, Y S Chang, Y T Huang, Y Chang, C H Tsai, M M Hsu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common head and neck cancer in Taiwan. Early detection is the best way to improve survival for this disease. A prospective study was designed to assess the feasibility of a new screening method for NPC by use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on the close association of NPC and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).
METHODS: One hundred thirty-three different tissues from nasopharynx, nose, and sinus were investigated by use of PCR to check for the presence of EBV genome. Subsequently, from April 1996 to March 1997, 55 patients were enrolled in a prospective screening study. All patients underwent nasopharyngeal swabs before biopsy. Polymerase chain reaction detection of EBV genome was conducted on swab samples. Anti-EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) in IgA and IgG class were checked at the same visit.
RESULTS: The EBV genome was present in 91.4% (85/93) of NPC tissues and in 25.0% (10/40) of non-NPC tissues (p < .001, chi2 test). Of the 55 swabs, 49 (89.1%) specimens obtained enough cells for PCR examination. Thirty of these 49 patients were pathologically proved NPC. The presence of EBV were 86.7% (26/30) in NPC group and 42.1% (8/19) in non-NPC group. The sensitivity and specificity were 86.7% and 57.9%, respectively, which were similar to those of serologic method (87.5% and 43.5%) when the cut-off point was set at anti-VCA IgG > or = 160 and IgA > or = 10. Combining both methods elevates the specificity to 84.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of this PCR screening method is similar to that of the serologic method. Combining both methods can greatly increase the specificity, indicating this new method is a good supplement to the serologic screening of this endemic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790296     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199812)20:8<732::aid-hed12>3.0.co;2-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  5 in total

Review 1.  Screening for nasopharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Shujuan Yang; Siying Wu; Jing Zhou; Xiao Y Chen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-06

2.  Association of p53 codon72 Arg>Pro polymorphism with susceptibility to nasopharyngeal carcinoma: evidence from a case-control study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S K Sahu; S Chakrabarti; S D Roy; N Baishya; R R Reddy; S Suklabaidya; A Kumar; S Mohanty; S Maji; A Suryanwanshi; S Rajasubramaniam; M Asthana; A K Panda; S P Singh; S Ganguly; O P Shaw; A K Bichhwalia; P K Sahoo; N R Chattopadhyay; K Chatterjee; C N Kundu; A K Das; R Kannan; E Zomawia; S A Sema; Y I Singh; S K Ghosh; K Sharma; B S Das; T Choudhuri
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 7.485

3.  SELDI-TOF MS profiling of serum for detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuan-Jiao Huang; Chao Xuan; Bei-Bei Zhang; Ming Liao; Kai-Feng Deng; Min He; Jin-Min Zhao
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-06-17

4.  Epstein-Barr virus mir-bart1-5p detection via nasopharyngeal brush sampling is effective for diagnosing nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Zheng; Li-Xia Lu; Cui Cui; Ming-Yuan Chen; Xi-Zhao Li; Wei-Hua Jia
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-26

5.  Nasopharyngeal brushing: a convenient and feasible sampling method for nucleic acid-based nasopharyngeal carcinoma research.

Authors:  Pei-Fen Zhang; Xiao-Hui Zheng; Xi-Zhao Li; Tian Tian; Shao-Dan Zhang; Ye-Zhu Hu; Wei-Hua Jia
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.