Literature DB >> 9790209

Biliary pancreatitis: the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

W H Schwesinger1, C P Page, G W Gross, J E Miller, W E Strodel, K R Sirinek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combined approach to the treatment of biliary pancreatitis using laparoscopic cholecystectomy and selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).
DESIGN: Consecutive case series.
SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing primary operations for biliary pancreatitis during 2 time periods were included. In the open era (June 1982 through May 1988), there were 276 patients; in the laparoscopic era (January 1996 through June 1997), there were 114 patients.
INTERVENTIONS: Open cholecystectomy with or without common bile duct exploration (CBDE); laparoscopic cholecystectomy with selective ERCP and/or laparoscopic CBDE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two periods were compared for morbidity, mortality, the duration of preoperative and postoperative stays, and the total length of hospitalization.
RESULTS: Both groups were demographically similar and had the same mortality (1.9%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomies provided a preoperative stay comparable to open cholecystectomy (6.4 vs 5.8 days), a shorter postoperative stay (1.5 vs 8.5 days), a lower incidence of CBDE (6.6% vs 26%), and a lower morbidity (8% vs 13.7%). The addition of an ERCP to laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with prolongation of the preoperative stay (7.4 vs 5.0 days), a comparable postoperative stay, a lower conversion rate (7.5% vs 13%), and fewer CBDEs (3% vs 13%). In 27 (42%) of the 64 ERCP cases, no stones were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of biliary pancreatitis with combined laparoscopic cholecystectomy and selective ERCP is safe and effective and is associated with a shorter hospitalization and fewer CBDEs than open cholecystectomy. Unnecessary ERCPs can be reduced by improved selection criteria or greater dependence on operative CBDE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9790209     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  5 in total

1.  Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Salleh Ibrahim; Tay Khoon Hean; Lim Swee Ho; T Ravintharan; Tan Ngian Chye; Chng Hong Chee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  J F Zhu; X H Fan; X H Zhang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Effect of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy on outcome after gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Robert S Bennion; Lance E Wyatt; Jesse E Thompson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  The role of intraoperative cholangiogram in the management of patients recovering from acute biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  H Shayan; D Kopac; C B Sample
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Role of intraoperative cholangiography for detecting residual stones after biliary pancreatitis: still useful? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Abdelaal; Moamena El-Matbouly; Ibnouf Sulieman; Ahmad Elfaki; Tamer El-Bakary; Sherif Abdelaziem; Salahdin Gehani; Adriana Toro; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 5.469

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.