Literature DB >> 9789854

A study of the reliability of the Canada Fitness Survey questionnaire.

I M Weller1, P N Corey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study are to assess the reliability of the physical activity components of the Canada Fitness Survey (CFS) questionnaire (N = 64 males, N = 63 females) and the Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test (N = 44 males, N = 52 females) in a sample of subjects between 15 and 80 yr.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation (rI) for the fitness scores was 0.98. The activity variables showed low to moderate correlations (rI = 0.48-0.53). Correlations were higher for males (rI = 0.38-0.65) than females (rI = 0.28-0.60) for most of the activity variables reported. Males generally report leisure activity more reliably than nonleisure activity, whereas the opposite was true for females. Males reported strenuous activity with higher reliability (rI = 0.86) than females (rI = 0.31). There was considerable variation in the reliability of specific activities. Of the components of physical activity (time, intensity, duration) that comprise the energy expenditure (EE) variable, the least reliably reported is intensity for both males (rI = 0.43) and females (rI = 0.55).
CONCLUSIONS: The CFS questionnaire is moderately reliable for most measures of physical activity. Estimates of reliability vary considerably among the various activities and components of these activities and between males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9789854     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199810000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  8 in total

Review 1.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Measurement of human energy expenditure, with particular reference to field studies: an historical perspective.

Authors:  Roy J Shephard; Yukitoshi Aoyagi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Mireille N M van Poppel; Mai J M Chinapaw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Perceived environment and physical activity in youth.

Authors:  Allan J Fein; Ronald C Plotnikoff; T Cameron Wild; John C Spence
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2004

Review 5.  Physical activity and all cause mortality in women: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Y Oguma; H D Sesso; R S Paffenbarger; I-M Lee
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 6.  A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.

Authors:  Kieran P Dowd; Robert Szeklicki; Marco Alessandro Minetto; Marie H Murphy; Angela Polito; Ezio Ghigo; Hidde van der Ploeg; Ulf Ekelund; Janusz Maciaszek; Rafal Stemplewski; Maciej Tomczak; Alan E Donnelly
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  The Relationship between Physical Fitness and Simulated Firefighting Task Performance.

Authors:  Goris Nazari; Joy C MacDermid; Kathryn E Sinden; Tom J Overend
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2018-04-12

8.  Snoring is associated with obesity among middle aged Slum-dwelling women in Mysore, India.

Authors:  Karl Krupp; Meredith Wilcox; Arun Srinivas; Vijaya Srinivas; Purnima Madhivanan; Elena Bastida
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2020 May-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.