Literature DB >> 9788385

Management of acquired rectourinary fistulas: outcome according to cause.

M Muñoz1, H Nelson, J Harrington, G Tsiotos, R Devine, D Engen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Acquired rectourinary fistulas, an infrequent complication of pelvic conditions, remain a therapeutic problem for which neither a widely accepted classification nor long-term outcome data are available. This study was designed to provide a new etiologic classification system and examine the success of various surgical therapies. It also looked at the need for permanent fecal or urinary diversion or radical excision depending on the cause of the fistula, i.e., benign vs. malignancy-related.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made of 41 patients treated for acquired rectourinary fistulas between 1980 and 1995. Acquired rectourinary fistulas were classified as 1) benign but caused by Crohn's disease, trauma, perirectal sepsis, or iatrogenic injury; and 2) malignancy-related fistulas secondary to neoplasm, radiation, surgery, or combined tumor and treatment effects. Surgical interventions were classified as repair, excision, fecal diversion, and urinary diversion.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven males and 4 females with acquired rectourinary fistula were identified with a mean age of 62 (range, 28-90) years. Nineteen patients had fistulas involving their urethras, and 22 patients had fistulas involving the bladder. Eight patients were not treated surgically; one was not treated because of an advanced malignancy, three because of patient preference, three because of sepsis, and one because of a poor general condition. Of the remaining 33 patients, nine had benign fistulas of which two were the result of Crohn's disease, two were the result of trauma, two were from an iatrogenic response, and three were from perirectal sepsis. Twenty-four patients had malignancy-related fistulas, and five patients had neoplasm at their fistula sites. The remaining 19 patients had malignancy-related fistulas that were the result of cancer treatments. Of the 19 malignancy-related fistulas, 5 were from radiation, 9 were from surgical trauma, and 5 were from radiation and surgical trauma. Forty-nine percent of the patients had undergone attempts at fistula treatment before referral. A resolution of symptoms after initial and reoperative surgery occurred more often in patients with benign fistulas (44 and 100 percent; mean, 1.8 surgeries per patient) compared with malignancy-related fistulas (21 and 88 percent; mean, 2.1 surgeries per patient). The rates of permanent fecal, urinary, and fecal plus urinary diversion were also lower for benign fistulas (11, 0, and 33 percent) compared with malignancy-related fistulas (13, 8, and 54 percent). Permanent diversion was avoided in 56 percent of the benign fistulas but in only 25 percent of the malignancy-related fistulas. The rates of excisional and radical (ileal conduit) surgery were lower for benign fistulas than for malignancy-related fistulas (44 and 11 percent vs. 50 and 54 percent).
CONCLUSION: Successful management of rectourinary fistulas typically requires aggressive reoperative therapy with permanent diversion more often required for malignancy-related fistulas. Better outcomes can be anticipated for benign fistulas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9788385     DOI: 10.1007/bf02258219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

Review 1.  Enterovesical fistulas: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  G Scozzari; A Arezzo; M Morino
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Rectal complications after modern radiation for prostate cancer: a colorectal surgical challenge.

Authors:  David W Larson; Kristin Chrouser; Tonia Young-Fadok; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Successful repair of iatrogenic rectourinary fistulas using the posterior sagittal transrectal approach (York-Mason): 15-year experience.

Authors:  Fabrizio Dal Moro; Mariangela Mancini; Francesco Pinto; Nicola Zanovello; Pier Francesco Bassi; Francesco Pagano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Transperineal approach to complex rectourinary fistulae.

Authors:  Henry Tran; Ryan Flannigan; Daniel Rapoport
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Indications and outcomes of enterovesical and colovesical fistulas: systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prevalence.

Authors:  Stefano Granieri; Francesco Sessa; Alessandro Bonomi; Sissi Paleino; Federica Bruno; Andrea Chierici; Ivano Massimiliano Sciannamea; Alessandro Germini; Riccardo Campi; Michele Talso; Antonio Facciorusso; Gianfranco Deiana; Sergio Serni; Christian Cotsoglou
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Management of enema tip-induced rectourethral fistula with gluteus maximus flap: report of a case.

Authors:  O Krand; E Unal
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Rectourethral fistula: systemic review of and experiences with various surgical treatment methods.

Authors:  Ji Hye Choi; Byeong Geon Jeon; Sang-Gi Choi; Eon Chul Han; Heon-Kyun Ha; Heung-Kwon Oh; Eun Kyung Choe; Sang Hui Moon; Seung-Bum Ryoo; Kyu Joo Park
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-02-28

Review 8.  When the bowel meets the bladder: Optimal management of colorectal pathology with urological involvement.

Authors:  Conor Keady; Daniel Hechtl; Myles Joyce
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-05-27

9.  Vascularized tunica vaginalis interposition flap for the treatment of recto-urethral fistulas.

Authors:  Rajendra Nerli; S S Amarkhed; M B Hiremath
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.