Literature DB >> 9787779

Muscle-tendon stresses and elastic energy storage during locomotion in the horse.

A A Biewener1.   

Abstract

The stresses acting in muscle-tendon units and ligaments of the forelimb and hindlimb of horses were determined over a range of speed and gait based on recordings of ground reaction forces and limb kinematics. Maximum stresses of 40-50 MPa were calculated to act in several of the principal forelimb (superficial digital flexor (SDF), deep digital flexor (DDF), ulnaris lateralis (UL) and flexor carpi ulnaris/radialis (FCU/R)) and hindlimb tendons (plantaris, DDF) at the fastest galloping speeds recorded (up to 7.4 m s-1). Smaller stresses were found for the gastrocnemius (GAST) tendon (30 MPa) and suspensory ligaments (S-Ligs) (18-25 MPa). Average peak muscle stresses reached 200-240 kPa during galloping. Tendon and muscle stresses increased more steeply with changes of gait and during galloping, than during trotting. Calculations of elastic strain energy storage based on tendon stress showed similar patterns of increase with change of speed and gait, with the greatest contribution to elastic savings by the DDF tendons of the forelimb and hindlimb. In general, the hindlimb contributed two-thirds and the forelimb one-third to overall energy storage. Comparison of tendon elastic energy savings with mechanical work showed a maximum 40% recovery of mechanical work by elastic savings when the horses changed gait from a walk to a slow trot. Percentage of recovery then decreased with increased trotting speed, but increased again with a change of gait to a gallop, reaching 36% recovery at the fastest measured galloping speed (7.4 m s-1). The long length of horse tendons in relation to extremely short pennate muscle fibers suggests a highly specialized design for economical muscle force generation and enhanced elastic energy savings. However, elastic energy savings in terms of percentage of recovery of mechanical work and metabolic energy is less than that observed in wallabies and kangaroos during hopping, but similar to that in humans during running, and greater than that for dogs during trotting and galloping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9787779     DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0491(98)00024-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol        ISSN: 1096-4959            Impact factor:   2.231


  59 in total

1.  Positive force feedback in bouncing gaits?

Authors:  Hartmut Geyer; Andre Seyfarth; Reinhard Blickhan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The impact of artificial selection on morphological integration in the appendicular skeleton of domestic horses.

Authors:  Pauline Hanot; Anthony Herrel; Claude Guintard; Raphaël Cornette
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Muscle architecture and functional anatomy of the pelvic limb of the ostrich (Struthio camelus).

Authors:  N C Smith; A M Wilson; K J Jespers; R C Payne
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Running stability is enhanced by a proximo-distal gradient in joint neuromechanical control.

Authors:  M A Daley; G Felix; A A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  The role of the extrinsic thoracic limb muscles in equine locomotion.

Authors:  R C Payne; P Veenman; A M Wilson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Functional specialisation of pelvic limb anatomy in horses (Equus caballus).

Authors:  R C Payne; J R Hutchinson; J J Robilliard; N C Smith; A M Wilson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Myosin isoforms and fibre types in limb muscles of Australian marsupials: adaptations to hopping and non-hopping locomotion.

Authors:  Wendy W H Zhong; Christine A Lucas; Joseph F Y Hoh
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 2.200

8.  Increased intensity and reduced frequency of EMG signals from feline self-reinnervated ankle extensors during walking do not normalize excessive lengthening.

Authors:  Annette Pantall; Emma F Hodson-Tole; Robert J Gregor; Boris I Prilutsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Muscle-tendon length and force affect human tibialis anterior central aponeurosis stiffness in vivo.

Authors:  Brent James Raiteri; Andrew Graham Cresswell; Glen Anthony Lichtwark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Functional anatomy of the gibbon forelimb: adaptations to a brachiating lifestyle.

Authors:  Fana Michilsens; Evie E Vereecke; Kristiaan D'Août; Peter Aerts
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.