Literature DB >> 9787450

Empirical evaluation of preservation methods for faecal DNA.

M A Frantzen1, J B Silk, J W Ferguson, R K Wayne, M H Kohn.   

Abstract

We evaluate the relative effectiveness of four methods for preserving faecal samples for DNA analysis. PCR assays of fresh faecal samples collected from free-ranging baboons showed that amplification success was dependent on preservation method, PCR-product size, and whether nuclear or mitochondrial DNA was assayed. Storage in a DMSO/EDTA/Tris/salt solution (DETs) was most effective for preserving nuclear DNA, but storage in 70% ethanol, freezing at -20 degrees C and drying performed approximately equally well for mitochondrial DNA and short (< 200 bp) nuclear DNA fragments. Because faecal DNA is diluted and degraded, repeated extractions from faeces may be necessary and short nuclear markers should be employed for genotyping. A review of molecular scatology studies further suggests that three to six faeces per individual should be collected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9787450     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00449.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  29 in total

1.  The effects of sequence length and oligonucleotide mismatches on 5' exonuclease assay efficiency.

Authors:  Steve Smith; Linda Vigilant; Phillip A Morin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A comparison of methods for total community DNA preservation and extraction from various thermal environments.

Authors:  Kendra R Mitchell; Cristina D Takacs-Vesbach
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Human gut microbiome and risk for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jiyoung Ahn; Rashmi Sinha; Zhiheng Pei; Christine Dominianni; Jing Wu; Jianxin Shi; James J Goedert; Richard B Hayes; Liying Yang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Multiplex PCR system for identifying the carnivore origins of faeces for an epidemiological study on Echinococcus multilocularis in Hokkaido, Japan.

Authors:  Nariaki Nonaka; Takafumi Sano; Takashi Inoue; Maria Teresa Armua; Daisuke Fukui; Ken Katakura; Yuzaburo Oku
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Examining spatial patterns of selection and use for an altered predator guild.

Authors:  Matthew A Mumma; Joseph D Holbrook; Nathaniel D Rayl; Christopher J Zieminski; Todd K Fuller; John F Organ; Shane P Mahoney; Lisette P Waits
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Estimating population size by genotyping faeces.

Authors:  M H Kohn; E C York; D A Kamradt; G Haught; R M Sauvajot; R K Wayne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Genotyping faecal samples of Bengal tiger Panthera tigris tigris for population estimation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jyotsna Bhagavatula; Lalji Singh
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms.

Authors:  Daniela Straube; Anita Juen
Journal:  Eur J Soil Biol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.846

9.  Influence of ancient glacial periods on the Andean fauna: the case of the pampas cat (Leopardus colocolo).

Authors:  Daniel Cossíos; Mauro Lucherini; Manuel Ruiz-García; Bernard Angers
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Deep subsurface mine stalactites trap endemic fissure fluid Archaea, Bacteria, and Nematoda possibly originating from ancient seas.

Authors:  Gaëtan Borgonie; Borja Linage-Alvarez; Abidemi Ojo; Steven Shivambu; Olukayode Kuloyo; Errol D Cason; Sihle Maphanga; Jan-G Vermeulen; Derek Litthauer; Colin D Ralston; Tullis C Onstott; Barbara Sherwood-Lollar; Esta Van Heerden
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.