Literature DB >> 9787031

A theoretical framework for sex-biased parental care.

.   

Abstract

I present game theory models for parental care by male and female parents of male and female offspring. The models include the effects of Fisherian frequency dependence (FFD), the trade-off between offspring fitness and the residual fitness of the parent, and the conflict between the two parents. The models are used to make predictions about the factors selecting for biases in parental care with respect to either offspring or parental sex. The models predict that: (1) male and female offspring will receive different amounts of care when the offspring functions (relating fitness accrued through an offspring to the amount of care that it receives, excluding the effects of FFD) differ between the male and female offspring; (2) male and female parents will give different amounts of care when either (a) the parental functions (relating the loss in residual fitness to the total amount of care given by the parent, excluding the effects of FFD) differ between male and female parents, or (b) offspring functions differ between male and female offspring and FFD also acts on residual fitness of parents; and (3) there will be an interaction between offspring and parental sex on the amount of care received (a) by an offspring within a family when the offspring functions are not the same for male and female parents (but then the sex bias is extreme and one parent does not care for one sex of offspring), and (b) by the family in relation to its sex ratio when offspring functions differ between male and female offspring (but not necessarily between male and female parents) and parental functions differ between male and female parents. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour

Year:  1998        PMID: 9787031     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  8 in total

1.  Relating paternity to paternal care.

Authors:  Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Parentally biased favouritism: why should parents specialize in caring for different offspring?

Authors:  C M Lessells
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Adaptive sex allocation in birds: the complexities of linking theory and practice.

Authors:  Jan Komdeur; Ido Pen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Individual variation and the resolution of conflict over parental care in penduline tits.

Authors:  René E van Dijk; Tamás Székely; Jan Komdeur; Akos Pogány; Tim W Fawcett; Franz J Weissing
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The Trivers-Willard hypothesis: sex ratio or investment?

Authors:  Carl Veller; David Haig; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Strategic adjustment of begging effort by banded mongoose pups.

Authors:  Matthew B V Bell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sex-specific effects of yolk testosterone on survival, begging and growth of zebra finches.

Authors:  Nikolaus von Engelhardt; Claudio Carere; Cor Dijkstra; Ton G G Groothuis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Parental investment matters for maternal and offspring immune defense in the mouthbrooding cichlid Astatotilapia burtoni.

Authors:  Isabel S Keller; Walter Salzburger; Olivia Roth
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.