Literature DB >> 9786320

Mandibular morphology and the efficacy of a mandibular advancement device in patients with sleep apnoea.

M Marklund1, K A Franklin, H Stenlund, M Persson.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the outcome of treatment using an intraoral mandibular advancement device in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea is associated with the mandibular morphology. The effects of the device on apnoeas and sleep were evaluated in 32 men with obstructive sleep apnoea in continuous polysomnographic sleep recordings including body position, during one night without the device and one night with it. Mandibular morphology variables were measured on cephalograms. The odds ratio for a supine apnoea-hypopnoea index of below 15 during treatment was 17 for a mandibular plane angle of 38 degrees or below, and 26 for a lower anterior face height of less then 73 mm. The outcome of treatment in the lateral sleep position was unrelated to any mandibular morphology variable. Patients with supine-dependent sleep apnoea defined by a supine apnoea-hypopnoea index of 10 or above and a lateral apnoea-hypopnoea index of below 10 had an odds ratio of 7 to have an orthognathic mandible with an SNB angle of 78 degrees or above. The present study suggests that a successful apnoea reduction using a mandibular advancement device is associated with a normal mandibular plane angle and a small lower anterior face height.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9786320     DOI: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106503.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci        ISSN: 0909-8836            Impact factor:   2.612


  6 in total

1.  Cephalometry and prediction of oral appliance treatment outcome.

Authors:  Andrew Tze Ming Ng; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter Petocz; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 2.  Anatomically Based Outcome Predictors of Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Intraoral Splint Devices: A Systematic Review of Cephalometric Studies.

Authors:  Luca Guarda-Nardini; Daniele Manfredini; Marta Mion; Gary Heir; Rosario Marchese-Ragona
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Tongue Base Reduction with Radiofrequency Tissue Ablation: Preliminary Results after Two Treatment Sessions.

Authors:  Boris A. Stuck; Joachim T. Maurer; Karl Hörmann
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 4.  Cephalometric predictors of treatment outcome with mandibular advancement devices in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giulio Alessandri-Bonetti; Daniela Rita Ippolito; Maria Lavinia Bartolucci; Vincenzo D'Antò; Serena Incerti-Parenti
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 5.  A consideration of factors affecting palliative oral appliance effectiveness for obstructive sleep apnea: a scoping review.

Authors:  Bruce S Haskell; Michael J Voor; Andrew M Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Correlation between cephalometric data and severity of sleep apnea.

Authors:  Vanessa Gonçalves Silva; Laíza Araújo Mohana Pinheiro; Priscila Leite da Silveira; Alexandre Scalli Mathias Duarte; Ana Célia Faria; Eduardo George Baptista de Carvalho; Edilson Zancanella; Agrício Nubiato Crespo
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014 May-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.