Literature DB >> 9786104

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: are preparatory interventions effective?

M L Hackett1, M R Lane, D C McCarthy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to examine the effects of preparatory cognitive and behavioral information on self-confidence, anxiety, and negative affect elicited by an impending upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
METHODS: Forty-eight male and female out-patients, between 18 and 65 years of age, scheduled for a first-time, non-emergency, endoscopic examination were randomly assigned to receive one of four experimental interventions: cognitive, behavioral, combination, or attention-control. Measures of self-reported anxiety and self-reported self-confidence were obtained.
RESULTS: Cognitive and combination intervention subjects were statistically younger than behavioral and attention-control subjects. A credibility assessment revealed that subjects who were taught visualization used it during their procedure. Results indicated that subjects in the cognitive and combination interventions experienced significant reduction in anxiety and increase in self-confidence from pre- to post-intervention. Self-confidence did not increase for subjects receiving the behavioral-only or the attention-control interventions.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that preparatory information in general is effective in reducing anxiety and in increasing self-confidence before an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Results suggest that teaching subjects visualization before a procedure increases their use of visualization during a procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9786104     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70001-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  5 in total

Review 1.  Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a safe and less costly alternative.

Authors:  Kia Saeian
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-06

2.  Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on safety and quality indicators in endoscopy.

Authors:  David Armstrong; Alan Barkun; Ron Bridges; Rose Carter; Chris de Gara; Catherine Dube; Robert Enns; Roger Hollingworth; Donald Macintosh; Mark Borgaonkar; Sylviane Forget; Grigorios Leontiadis; Jonathan Meddings; Peter Cotton; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: are preparatory interventions or conscious sedation effective? A randomized trial.

Authors:  Lucio Trevisani; Sergio Sartori; Piergiorgio Gaudenzi; Giuseppe Gilli; Giancarlo Matarese; Sergio Gullini; Vincenzo Abbasciano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Panic Attack during Elective Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Charalampos Mitsonis; Nikolaos Dimopoulos; Marianna Zavrou; Vassiliki Psarra; Christos Giofkos; Christos Fiorakis; Athanasios Dimitriadis; Dimitrios Valavanis; Eleni Vousoura; Iannis Zervas; Efstathios Papavassiliou
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.260

5.  The Effect of Preparatory Education Program on Discomfort and Retching of Examinees during Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Ju-Yeon Lee; Min-Whon Anhn; Eun-Tae Kim; Dae-Hyun Kim; Hyuk-Jung Kweon; Dong-Yung Cho; Hyung Moon Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Fam Med       Date:  2012-07-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.