Literature DB >> 9785529

Staying in or leaving rural practice: 1996 outcomes of rural doctors' 1986 intentions.

M Kamien1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the 1996 outcomes of a sample of Western Australian rural doctors who in 1986 had indicated their intentions to stay in or leave rural practice.
DESIGN: Postal questionnaire survey in December 1996, semi-structured interview and feedback by doctors on a draft of this article. PARTICIPANTS: 91 respondents from the 101 doctors who in 1986 had filled in a questionnaire on their intentions to stay in or leave rural practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of doctors whose actions by 1996 were at variance with their intentions in 1986, and the reasons for their change of direction.
RESULTS: 49% (22/45) of doctors who intended to leave had stayed ("stayers") and 24% (11/46) who intended to stay had left ("leavers"). Doctors' main concerns in 1986 were overwork, lack of locum relief, professional contact with colleagues, specialist backup in emergencies, downsizing of hospital facilities, continuing medical education, and income. By 1996 stayers had solved most of these professional problems and felt they were doing a special job which made a difference to their community. Conversely, more than half the leavers were unable to solve these problems and felt disempowered and dispirited. Their most potentially solvable problems were overwork, forced deskilling and conflict with other healthcare professionals.
CONCLUSION: Professional satisfaction was the main reason for doctors staying in or leaving rural practice. Professionally dissatisfied rural doctors reach a critical phase which they have to surmount if they are going to stay. An examination of the positive experiences of the stayers points the way to retaining at least half the potential future leavers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9785529     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb140285.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  7 in total

1.  No exit: an evaluation of measures of physician attrition.

Authors:  Diane R Rittenhouse; Elizabeth Mertz; Dennis Keane; Kevin Grumbach
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Who wants to work in a rural health post? The role of intrinsic motivation, rural background and faith-based institutions in Ethiopia and Rwanda.

Authors:  Pieter Serneels; Jose G Montalvo; Gunilla Pettersson; Tomas Lievens; Jean Damascene Butera; Aklilu Kidanu
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Physician and nurse job climates in hospital-based emergency departments in Taiwan: management and implications.

Authors:  Blossom Yen-Ju Lin; Chung-Ping Cliff Hsu; Ming-Chin Chao; Shi-Ping Luh; Siu-Wan Hung; Gerald-Mark Breen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  How effective and acceptable is Web 2.0 Balint group participation for general practitioners and general practitioner registrars in regional Australia? A pilot study.

Authors:  Hilton Koppe; Thea F van de Mortel; Christine M Ahern
Journal:  Aust J Rural Health       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 1.662

5.  Addressing the migration of health professionals: the role of working conditions and educational placements.

Authors:  Julia Witt
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Supervision, support and mentoring interventions for health practitioners in rural and remote contexts: an integrative review and thematic synthesis of the literature to identify mechanisms for successful outcomes.

Authors:  Anna M Moran; Julia Coyle; Rod Pope; Dianne Boxall; Susan A Nancarrow; Jennifer Young
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2014-02-13

7.  To stay or go? Unpacking the decision-making process and coping strategies of International Medical Graduates practising in rural, remote, and regional Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Bunmi S Malau-Aduli; Amy M Smith; Louise Young; Tarun Sen Gupta; Richard Hays
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.