Literature DB >> 9785434

Clinical examination compared with morphometry of digital photographs for evaluation of repaired cleft lips.

M Becker1, H Svensson, S Jacobsson.   

Abstract

Twenty-four adult patients who had been operated on as infants for isolated cleft lip underwent clinical examination combined with photographic documentation using a digital camera. The same predetermined protocol comprising 20 variables describing nasolabial appearance was used for both the clinical examination and the computerised evaluation of the images. The correlation between the two methods is described in the present study. The results obtained with the two methods agreed closely. For metric variables the mean coefficient of correlation was 0.73 and when all measurements were combined, it reached 0.98. Likewise, discrete variables showed a close correlation, with a mean kappa value of 0.72. Variables related to muscular dynamics of the lip can for obvious reasons not be judged from photographs. However, the computerised photographic evaluation was able to detect more precisely even minor angular deviations of the nose and to measure areas such as the areas of the nostrils. We conclude that morphometry of digital photographs is a new valuable clinical tool for the assessment of the nasolabial appearance in patients with cleft lip and palate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9785434     DOI: 10.1080/02844319850158642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg        ISSN: 0284-4311


  5 in total

1.  Rating nasolabial appearance on three-dimensional images in cleft lip and palate: a comparison with standard photographs.

Authors:  Adam Stebel; Dries Desmedt; Ewald Bronkhorst; Mette A Kuijpers; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Surgical outcomes auditing systems in humanitarian organizations.

Authors:  Luis Bermudez; Victoria Carter; William Magee; Randy Sherman; Ruben Ayala
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons.

Authors:  Alex Campbell; Carolina Restrepo; Gaurav Deshpande; Caroline Tredway; Sarah M Bernstein; Rachel Patzer; Lisa Wendby; Bjorn Schonmeyr
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-09-13

4.  Evaluating aesthetics of the nasolabial region in children with cleft lip and palate: professional analysis and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Tatiana Saito Paiva; Marcia Andre
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Structural outcomes in the Cleft Care UK study. Part 2: dento-facial outcomes.

Authors:  R Al-Ghatam; T E M Jones; A J Ireland; N E Atack; O Chawla; S Deacon; L Albery; A R M Cobb; J Cadogan; S Leary; A Waylen; A K Wills; B Richard; H Bella; A R Ness; J R Sandy
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.826

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.