Literature DB >> 9785251

Variability of some SEMG parameter estimates with electrode location.

J Y Hogrel1, J Duchêne, J F Marini.   

Abstract

Muscular action potential conduction velocity (CV) and mean power frequency (MPF) are commonly used parameters to describe the surface electromyographic signal (SEMG). The discrepancies concerning the behavior and interpretation of these main parameters in the literature have motivated this work. Our objective was to evaluate within- and between-individual reproducibility, sensitivity and variation of CV and MPF depending on the electrode location with respect to various contraction modalities. The results present evidence for significant influence of electrode location on CV and MPF, not only in their initial values but also in their changes during fatiguing efforts. This influence appears to be subject-dependent. This variability seems to be essentially due to the relative displacements of myotendinous and neuromuscular junctions with respect to the electrode set. Moreover, this study shows that MPF can be seen as force-dependent under certain conditions and that the CV-MPF relationship is strongly influenced by methodological factors. In conclusion, it seems irrelevant to derive reliable SEMG parameter estimates without considering electrode location. There is a strong need for proper standardization based on anatomical and methological aspects before attempting any individual characterization. Finally, we suggest a procedure for assessment of measurement quality.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9785251     DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(97)00043-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  9 in total

1.  Motor unit conduction velocity distribution estimation: assessment of two short-term processing methods.

Authors:  J Y Hogrel; J Duchêne
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Influence of muscle fibre shortening on estimates of conduction velocity and spectral frequencies from surface electromyographic signals.

Authors:  E Schulte; D Farina; R Merletti; G Rau; C Disselhorst-Klug
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Non-uniform recruitment along human rectus femoris muscle during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Kohei Watanabe; Motoki Kouzaki; Ryosuke Ando; Hiroshi Akima; Toshio Moritani
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Activation characteristics of shoulder muscles during maximal and submaximal efforts.

Authors:  Christoph Anders; Susanne Bretschneider; Annette Bernsdorf; Wolfgang Schneider
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Comparison of electromyography and joint moment as indicators of co-contraction.

Authors:  Brian A Knarr; Joseph A Zeni; Jill S Higginson
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Trapezius upper portion trigger points treatment purpose in positional release therapy with electromyographic analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Kelencz; Victor Alexandre F Tarini; Cesar Ferreira Amorim
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-10

7.  Validation of mDurance, A Wearable Surface Electromyography System for Muscle Activity Assessment.

Authors:  Alejandro Molina-Molina; Emilio J Ruiz-Malagón; Francisco Carrillo-Pérez; Luis E Roche-Seruendo; Miguel Damas; Oresti Banos; Felipe García-Pinillos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Introduction of a sEMG Sensor System for Autonomous Use by Inexperienced Users.

Authors:  Elisa Romero Avila; Elmar Junker; Catherine Disselhorst-Klug
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Distribution of motor unit potential velocities in short static and prolonged dynamic contractions at low forces: use of the within-subject's skewness and standard deviation variables.

Authors:  E G Klaver-Król; N R Henriquez; S J Oosterloo; P Klaver; J M Bos; M J Zwarts
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.078

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.