Literature DB >> 9784818

Static and dynamic roentgenographic analysis of ankle stability in braced and nonbraced stable and functionally unstable ankles.

P H Vaes1, W Duquet, P P Casteleyn, F Handelberg, P Opdecam.   

Abstract

Patients suffering from functional ankle instability were selected based on a structured interview. Talar tilt was measured using supine ankle stress roentgenographs and standing talar tilt was measured using erect ankle stress roentgenographs. A digital roentgenocinematographic analysis of a 50 degrees ankle sprain simulation was performed to measure dynamic talar tilt and inversion distance between two video images (inversion speed). A significant decrease in pathologic supine talar tilt in unstable ankles was found in the braced compared with the nonbraced situation (talar tilt = 13.1 degrees versus 4.8 degrees with brace). The talar tilt with the brace after activity was still significantly lower than the initial value without the brace. The standing talar tilt of unstable ankles was shown to be significantly lower with the orthosis than without (standing talar tilt = 16.6 degrees versus 12.0 degrees with brace). Roentgenocinematographic evaluation of ankle sprain simulation showed that the mean dynamic talar tilt during simulated sprain decreased significantly in the braced ankles compared with the nonbraced ankles (dynamic talar tilt = 9.8 degrees versus 6.4 degrees braced). A significant decrease in the digital measurement of inversion distance (from 110.6 pixels to 92.4 pixels) was observed in the total sample of 39 ankles during the initial high-speed phase of the simulated sprain. The brace significantly slows down the inversion speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9784818     DOI: 10.1177/03635465980260051601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  18 in total

Review 1.  Rehabilitation of ligamentous ankle injuries: a review of recent studies.

Authors:  C Zöch; V Fialka-Moser; M Quittan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Peroneal Reaction Times and Eversion Motor Response in Healthy and Unstable Ankles.

Authors:  Peter Vaes; William Duquet; Bart Van Gheluwe
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Effects of Ankle Taping and Bracing.

Authors:  Gary B Wilkerson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Effect of athletic taping and kinesiotaping® on measurements of functional performance in basketball players with chronic inversion ankle sprains.

Authors:  Seda Bicici; Nihan Karatas; Gul Baltaci
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

5.  Development and reliability of the ankle instability instrument.

Authors:  Carrie L Docherty; Bruce M Gansneder; Brent L Arnold; Shepard R Hurwitz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Effects of high-top and low-top shoes on ankle inversion.

Authors:  M D Ricard; S S Schulties; J J Saret
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Low-load eversion force sense, self-reported ankle instability, and frequency of giving way.

Authors:  Brent L Arnold; Carrie L Docherty
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Developing a framework for ankle function: a delphi study.

Authors:  Kelli R Snyder; Todd A Evans; Peter J Neibert
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Functional performance testing in participants with functional ankle instability and in a healthy control group.

Authors:  Amanda S Buchanan; Carrie L Docherty; John Schrader
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Chronic Ankle Instability Does Not Affect Lower Extremity Functional Performance.

Authors:  Kerry M Demeritt; Sandra J Shultz; Carrie L Docherty; Bruce M Gansneder; David H Perrin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.