Literature DB >> 9784209

The influence of body coloration on shoaling preferences in fish.

.   

Abstract

Shoaling behaviour provides antipredator benefits that rely, to some extent, on a high degree of phenotypic homogeneity between individuals within the shoal. Therefore, fish should have the ability to discriminate between potential shoalmates, choosing to associate with individuals of similar appearance to themselves. We studied the effects of a single phenotypic character, body coloration, on association choices made by black and white mollies (Poecilia latipinna). When given a choice between a group of mollies of similar coloration and an empty compartment, individual test fish (black or white) spent significantly more time near the fish group. When given a choice between a group of black mollies and a group of white mollies, individual fish (black or white) spent significantly more time near the group of mollies of similar coloration to their own. When given a choice between a group of mollies of dissimilar coloration and an empty compartment, black and white mollies reacted differently. Black mollies spent significantly more time on the side of the central compartment closest to the white mollies, while there was no significant difference between the time spent by white mollies on either side of the test tank. Our results indicate that fish can use visual cues to discriminate actively between potential shoalmates on the basis of body coloration. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 9784209     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  20 in total

1.  Within-shoal phenotypic homogeneity affects shoaling preference in a killifish.

Authors:  Silvia Cattelan; Matteo Griggio
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Fish cam: an online tool for introducing shoaling behavior to the classroom.

Authors:  Maura Southwell; Maria Galassi; Scott McRobert
Journal:  Zebrafish       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Mixed-phenotype grouping: the interaction between oddity and crypsis.

Authors:  Gwendolen M Rodgers; Helen Kimbell; Lesley J Morrell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An analysis of visual oddity concept learning in a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus).

Authors:  Petra Hille; Guido Dehnhardt; Björn Mauck
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Contrasting stripes are a widespread feature of group living in birds, mammals and fishes.

Authors:  Juan J Negro; Jorge Doña; M Carmen Blázquez; Airam Rodríguez; James E Herbert-Read; M de L Brooke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Assessment and assortment: how fishes use local and global cues to choose which school to go to.

Authors:  Ashley J W Ward; Paul J B Hart; Jens Krause
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The Tagging Procedure of Visible Implant Elastomers Influences Zebrafish Individual and Social Behavior.

Authors:  Tommaso Ruberto; Romain J G Clément; Chiara Spinello; Daniele Neri; Simone Macrì; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  Zebrafish       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  The social zebrafish: behavioral responses to conspecific, heterospecific, and computer animated fish.

Authors:  Cristina Saverino; Robert Gerlai
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Boldness, Aggression, and Shoaling Assays for Zebrafish Behavioral Syndromes.

Authors:  Gregory P Way; Maura Southwell; Scott P McRobert
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Phenotypic assortment by body shape in wild-caught fish shoals.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kelley; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.