Literature DB >> 9783759

Oral iloprost in Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis: a multicentre, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison study.

C M Black1, L Halkier-Sørensen, J J Belch, S Ullman, R Madhok, A J Smit, J D Banga, H R Watson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal dose of oral iloprost on the basis of efficacy and tolerability in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis.
DESIGN: Multicentre, randomized, parallel-group comparison of two different doses of oral iloprost and placebo.
SETTING: European university hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 103 patients with Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis. INTERVENTION: Patients received one of three treatments for 6 weeks: placebo, oral iloprost 50 microg or oral iloprost 100 microg. Each treatment was taken twice daily, giving total daily doses of iloprost of 100 and 200 microg. MEASUREMENTS: The frequency, total daily duration and severity of Raynaud's attacks were recorded in a specially designed patient diary; physician's global assessment and adverse events were recorded at visits to the clinic. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat population.
RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were recruited, 89 completed the assessments throughout the treatment period and 82 completed an additional 6 weeks of follow-up after treatment. Thirty-five patients received placebo, 33 received iloprost 50 microg and 35 received iloprost 100 microg. The mean percentage reductions in the frequency, total daily duration and severity of Raynaud's attacks were numerically greater in the iloprost groups at the end of treatment and at the end of follow-up. At the end of treatment (6 weeks), there were significant treatment differences in the total daily duration of attacks (P = 0.03), but not in the severity (P = 0.07) or the frequency of attacks (P = 0.37). At the end of follow-up (12 weeks), there were significant treatment differences in the total daily duration of attacks (P = 0.001) and in the severity of attacks (P = 0.007), but not in the frequency of attacks (P = 0.07). Percentages of patients improved at the end of treatment as assessed by the physician were 44% placebo, 57% iloprost 50 microg and 64% iloprost 100 microg (not significant). Side-effects were reported by 80% of patients on placebo, 85% on oral iloprost 50 microg and 97% on oral iloprost 100 microg. Premature discontinuations of treatment in each group were 9, 30 and 51%, respectively, with 6, 27 and 51% being due to adverse events.
CONCLUSION: The results on the daily duration of Raynaud's attacks suggest that both 50 and 100 microg oral iloprost twice daily may be effective in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis. The 50 microg iloprost dose was better tolerated in this patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9783759     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.9.952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0263-7103


  25 in total

Review 1.  Combination therapies for systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  C P Denton; C M Black
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2001

2.  Oral iloprost improves endobronchial dysplasia in former smokers.

Authors:  Robert L Keith; Patrick J Blatchford; John Kittelson; John D Minna; Karen Kelly; Pierre P Massion; Wilbur A Franklin; Jenny Mao; David O Wilson; Daniel T Merrick; Fred R Hirsch; Timothy C Kennedy; Paul A Bunn; Mark W Geraci; York E Miller
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-06

3.  Bosentan therapy for patients with severe Raynaud's phenomenon in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  M E Hettema; D Zhang; H Bootsma; C G M Kallenberg
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  New lines in therapy of Raynaud's phenomenon.

Authors:  Sevdalina Nikolova Lambova; Ulf Müller-Ladner
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  [Therapy of systemic sclerosis].

Authors:  M Meurer; P Rehberger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  Evaluation of test characteristics for outcome measures used in Raynaud's phenomenon clinical trials.

Authors:  Heather Gladue; Paul Maranian; Harold E Paulus; Dinesh Khanna
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  Current Treatment Options in Raynaud's Phenomenon.

Authors:  Sergio Generini; Angela Del Rosso; Alberto Pignone; Marco Matucci Cerinic
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2003-04

8.  Patient-reported outcome instruments for assessing Raynaud's phenomenon in systemic sclerosis: A SCTC Vascular Working Group Report.

Authors:  John D Pauling; Tracy M Frech; Michael Hughes; Jessica K Gordon; Robyn T Domsic; Marina E Anderson; Francesca Ingegnoli; Neil J McHugh; Sindhu R Johnson; Marie Hudson; Francesco Boin; Voon H Ong; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Nezam Altorok; Marina Scolnik; Mandana Nikpour; Ankoor Shah; Janet E Pope; Dinesh Khanna; Ariane L Herrick
Journal:  J Scleroderma Relat Disord       Date:  2018-05-24

Review 9.  Raynaud's phenomenon (secondary).

Authors:  Ariane Herrick
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-09-26

Review 10.  Advances in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon.

Authors:  Terri L Levien
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-03-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.