Literature DB >> 9782692

Humanistic outcomes in the hypertension and COPD arms of a multicenter outcomes study.

G A Gourley1, T S Portner, D R Gourley, E L Rigolosi, J M Holt, D K Solomon, G E Bass, W R Wicke, R L Braden.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of pharmaceutical care on selected humanistic outcomes in patients with hypertension or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
DESIGN: Clinic patients with hypertension or COPD were randomly assigned to a treatment group (pharmaceutical care) or a control group (traditional pharmacy care) over a six-month period. Clinical pharmacists and pharmacy residents conducted the protocols. There were 133 evaluable patients (63 treatment, 70 control) in the hypertension study arm and 98 evaluable patients (43 treatment, 55 control) in the COPD study arm. The Pharmaceutical Care Questionnaire evaluated patient satisfaction with care. Tests specific to the disease states assessed disease and disease management knowledge. Quality of life (QOL) was evaluated using the Health Status Questionnaire 2.0 (HSQ 2.0) in the COPD arm; in the hypertension arm, the Hypertension/Lipid TyPE Specification Form 5.1 was used.
SETTING: Ambulatory care centers of 10 Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) medical centers and 1 university medical center.
INTERVENTIONS: Patient-centered pharmaceutical care model (employing standardized care) implemented by clinical pharmacy residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction with pharmaceutical care, disease and disease management knowledge, and QOL.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in most satisfaction items were found, with treatment patients expressing greater satisfaction. Treatment groups in both arms strongly agreed that pharmacists helped them with confidence in use of their medication and understanding of their illness, gave complete explanations about their medications, made them feel that their care was a priority, and followed up on their questions and concerns. In the hypertension arm, treatment patients demonstrated significant increases in knowledge scores. Trends in QOL were positive for both hypertension groups, with a significant decrease found in number of treatment patients reporting problems with sexual function. In the COPD arm, improvement trends were significantly stronger for treatment patients.
CONCLUSION: Although patients were not dissatisfied with traditional pharmacy care, they were more satisfied overall with the pharmaceutical care model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9782692     DOI: 10.1016/s1086-5802(16)30372-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash)        ISSN: 1086-5802


  20 in total

1.  Issues in conducting randomized controlled trials of health services research interventions in nonacademic practice settings: the case of retail pharmacies.

Authors:  Morris Weinberger; Michael D Murray; David G Marrero; Nancy Brewer; Michael Lykens; Lisa E Harris; A Jeffrey Newell; Joyce Collins; William M Tierney
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Complex pharmaceutical care intervention in pulmonary care: part B. Patient opinion and process survey.

Authors:  Ada G G Stuurman-Bieze; Mirjam E A P Kokenberg; Hilde Tobi; Willem O de Boer; Jasperien E van Doormaal; Lolkje T W Jong-van den de Berg; Th F J Tromp
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2005-10

Review 3.  Pharmaceutical care and health related quality of life outcomes over the past 25 years: Have we measured dimensions that really matter?

Authors:  Mohammed A Mohammed; Rebekah J Moles; Timothy F Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-01-10

Review 4.  Evaluation of pharmacist care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Han Zhong; Xiao-Jun Ni; Min Cui; Xiao-Yan Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-10-22

Review 5.  Effect of outpatient pharmacists' non-dispensing roles on patient outcomes and prescribing patterns.

Authors:  Nancy Nkansah; Olga Mostovetsky; Christine Yu; Tami Chheng; Johnny Beney; Christine M Bond; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-07-07

Review 6.  A systematic review of the research on communication between patients and health care professionals about medicines: the consequences for concordance.

Authors:  Fiona A Stevenson; Kate Cox; Nicky Britten; Yenal Dundar
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 7.  Self-management education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Monninkhof; P van der Valk; J van der Palen; C van Herwaarden; M R Partridge; G Zielhuis
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  [Validation of a questionnaire on patient satisfaction with the dispensing service in community pharmacies].

Authors:  Pedro D Armando Carle; Sonia A N Uema; Sebastián R Martínez Pérez; Merçè Martí Pallarés; Nancy H Solá Uthurry; María J Faus Dáder
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 9.  Does pharmacist-led medication review help to reduce hospital admissions and deaths in older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Richard Holland; James Desborough; Larry Goodyer; Sandra Hall; David Wright; Yoon K Loke
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 10.  Identifying potentially cost effective chronic care programs for people with COPD.

Authors:  L M G Steuten; K M M Lemmens; A P Nieboer; H J M Vrijhoef
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2009-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.