Literature DB >> 9782671

Reliability and validity of a questionnaire for assessment of energy expenditure and physical activity in epidemiological studies.

I Suzuki1, N Kawakami, H Shimizu.   

Abstract

A self-administered physical activity questionnaire (PA-questionnaire) was developed to assess daily energy expenditure and weekly physical activity in epidemiological studies. The Calorie Counter method (CC-method) was administered to 49 male and 32 female volunteers aged 18-64 years, on 7 consecutive days; after the measurement, the subjects were asked to complete the PA-questionnaire (validation study). The PA-questionnaire was completed by 95 males and 119 females (aged 35-73 years) twice with one-year interval (reliability study). The validation study showed that the mean daily energy expenditure estimated by the PA-questionnaire was slightly and significantly (4.5%) lower than that determined by the CC-method for males (p < 0.05); while no significant difference was observed for females (p > 0.05), mean weekly physical activities were similar between the PA-questionnaire and CC-method in males and females. Daily energy expenditures by the two methods strongly correlated with each other: r = 0.56 (p < 0.001) in males and r = 0.67 (p < 0.001) in females. Weekly physical activities by the two methods also strongly correlated with each other: r = 0.68 (p < 0.001) in males and r = 0.69 (p < 0.001) in females. The reliability study indicated that the Pearson's correlation coefficients between two assessments of daily energy expenditure and weekly physical activity over one-year ranged from 0.37 to 0.62 (p < 0.001). These data indicate that the PA-questionnaire has adequate levels of validity and test-retest reliability in assessment of daily energy expenditure and weekly physical activity in epidemiological studies.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9782671     DOI: 10.2188/jea.8.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0917-5040            Impact factor:   3.211


  26 in total

Review 1.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Effects of daily activity recorded by pedometer on peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), ventilatory threshold and leg extension power in 30- to 69-year-old Japanese without exercise habit.

Authors:  Jian-Guo Zhang; Toshiki Ohta; Kazuko Ishikawa-Takata; Izumi Tabata; Mitsumasa Miyashita
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Mireille N M van Poppel; Mai J M Chinapaw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Evaluation of a short retrospective questionnaire for physical activity in women.

Authors:  Martina E Schmidt; Tracy Slanger; Jenny Chang-Claude; Jürgen Wahrendorf; Karen Steindorf
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  A single-item global job satisfaction measure is associated with quantitative blood immune indices in white-collar employees.

Authors:  Akinori Nakata; Masahiro Irie; Masaya Takahashi
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.179

6.  Dietary magnesium intake and the risk of diabetes in the Japanese community: results from the Takayama study.

Authors:  Kie Konishi; Keiko Wada; Takashi Tamura; Michiko Tsuji; Toshiaki Kawachi; Chisato Nagata
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 5.614

7.  Is self-rated health associated with blood immune markers in healthy individuals?

Authors:  Akinori Nakata; Masaya Takahashi; Yasumasa Otsuka; Naomi G Swanson
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2010-09

8.  Height, weight, and alcohol consumption in relation to the risk of colorectal cancer in Japan: a prospective study.

Authors:  N Shimizu; C Nagata; H Shimizu; M Kametani; N Takeyama; T Ohnuma; S Matsushita
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-04-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study: design of study and profile of participants at baseline.

Authors:  Shinichi Kuriyama; Naoki Nakaya; Kaori Ohmori-Matsuda; Taichi Shimazu; Nobutaka Kikuchi; Masako Kakizaki; Toshimasa Sone; Fumi Sato; Masato Nagai; Yumi Sugawara; Yasutake Tomata; Munira Akhter; Mizuka Higashiguchi; Naru Fukuchi; Hideko Takahashi; Atsushi Hozawa; Ichiro Tsuji
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Husband's smoking status and breast cancer risk in Japan: From the Takayama study.

Authors:  Keiko Wada; Toshiaki Kawachi; Akihiro Hori; Naoharu Takeyama; Shinobu Tanabashi; Shogen Matsushita; Naoki Tokimitsu; Chisato Nagata
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 6.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.