UNLABELLED: The aim of this study is the analysis of electrical failures in transvenous cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) lead systems with regard to the importance of device implemented diagnostic and measurement functions and the potential role of an automated device-control in the detection of lead failures. METHODS: All consecutive ICD patients at our institution were enrolled in this retrospective investigation. The routine follow-up controls consisted in a complete evaluation of all diagnostic and measurement ICD features and additional controls in case of spontaneous arrhythmia episodes. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty patients, 193 male and 37 female, were enrolled in this study (mean age: 61.5 +/- 10.2 years; mean LVEF 32 +/- 9%). During a mean follow-up period of 29.5 +/- 18.4 (6-76) months, lead failure occurred in 19 patients (8%), 16 patients were implanted with an ICD, capable of diagnostic and measurement functions. All nonadequate device discharges could be classified as sensing-failure by stored electrograms. Device implemented measurement features revealed clinical important information in 13/16 patients (81%). In 14/16 patients, the lead defect could not be detected during routine follow-up. At the time of documented lead failure the safety of the implanted devices was already lost in 6/16 patients (38%). CONCLUSIONS: Device implemented diagnostic and measurement options are of great importance in the early detection of ICD lead failures. The implementation of automated measurements of lead related parameters in connection with a patient alert function may contribute to a further increase in the safety of ICD therapy.
UNLABELLED: The aim of this study is the analysis of electrical failures in transvenous cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) lead systems with regard to the importance of device implemented diagnostic and measurement functions and the potential role of an automated device-control in the detection of lead failures. METHODS: All consecutive ICDpatients at our institution were enrolled in this retrospective investigation. The routine follow-up controls consisted in a complete evaluation of all diagnostic and measurement ICD features and additional controls in case of spontaneous arrhythmia episodes. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty patients, 193 male and 37 female, were enrolled in this study (mean age: 61.5 +/- 10.2 years; mean LVEF 32 +/- 9%). During a mean follow-up period of 29.5 +/- 18.4 (6-76) months, lead failure occurred in 19 patients (8%), 16 patients were implanted with an ICD, capable of diagnostic and measurement functions. All nonadequate device discharges could be classified as sensing-failure by stored electrograms. Device implemented measurement features revealed clinical important information in 13/16 patients (81%). In 14/16 patients, the lead defect could not be detected during routine follow-up. At the time of documented lead failure the safety of the implanted devices was already lost in 6/16 patients (38%). CONCLUSIONS: Device implemented diagnostic and measurement options are of great importance in the early detection of ICD lead failures. The implementation of automated measurements of lead related parameters in connection with a patient alert function may contribute to a further increase in the safety of ICD therapy.
Authors: Christian G Wollmann; Dirk Böcker; Andreas Löher; Hans H Scheld; Günter Breithardt; Rainer Gradaus Journal: Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol Date: 2009-02-11